Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of recycled aluminum Metal Matrix Composites (MMC) reinforced with stainless steel bidirectional continuous fibers

I. J. Eguia-Cambero, R. Lostado-Lorza, M. Corral-Bobadilla, Saúl Íñiguez-Macedo, F. Gomez
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of recycled aluminum Metal Matrix Composites (MMC) reinforced with stainless steel bidirectional continuous fibers","authors":"I. J. Eguia-Cambero, R. Lostado-Lorza, M. Corral-Bobadilla, Saúl Íñiguez-Macedo, F. Gomez","doi":"10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metal Matrix Composite materials (MMC) are usually made by dispersing a reinforcing material embedded and completely continuous in a monolithic material or metal matrix. The reinforcing material can be metal, ceramic or an organic compound that provides the MMC with an increase in stiffness, strength, conductivity, corrosion resistance, thermal properties, wear resistance and fatigue life. Its manufacture requires considerable energy and raw material, since the matrix material must be fused in a furnace. In recent years, the valuation of waste, as well as the reduction of the impact of the product or process on the environment, has forced the use of some material waste for the manufacture of new composite materials. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool that is used to evaluate the consumption of energy and raw materials, and the impact of waste and emissions of a product or process on the environment. This work proposes a comprehensive studio to determine the yield stress, tensile strength and toughness, as well as the LCA of the manufacturing process of a novel composite material that is composed of EN AW 6082 recycled aluminum alloy matrix reinforced with bidirectional continuous fibers of AISI 304 stainless steel. Five wire diameters and wires spacing oriented at 0°were studied. These were: Ø0.32 mm x 1.41 mm, Ø0.5 mm x 1.81 mm; Ø0.6 mm x 2.177 mm; Ø0.75 mm x 2.72 mm and Ø0.8 mm x 2.7828 mm. The results were compared to those of unreinforced EN AW 6082 recycled aluminum matrix without its bidirectional continuous fibers. The combination of wire diameter wire spacing of 0.8 mm x 2.828 mm provided an increase in tensile strength of 136% over than of unreinforced aluminum. Moreover, the combination of Ø0.32 mm x 1.41 mm and Ø0.8 mm x 2.828 mm gave an increase in toughness of 25%, whereas the combination of Ø0.6 mm x 2.177 mm gave an increase in toughness of 175%. Also, some of the environmental impacts of the manufacturing process of the proposed MMC for each of the five diameters and wires spacing studied hardly varied considerably with respect to unreinforced aluminum. The combination of Ø0.8 mm x 2.828 mm is the one that generates the greatest environmental impact, showing an increase of 2.47%, 0.49%, 30.62% and 50.20% for the abiotic depletion, global warming, human toxicity and acidification respectively. From the results obtained from yield stress, tensile strength and toughness, as well as the LCA of the manufacturing process, it can be stated that the novel MMC proposed in this study has a significant load capacity, both static and dynamic, capable of revaluing a metallic waste, while its manufacturing cost is reduced compared to the manufacturing cost of other MMCs.","PeriodicalId":295373,"journal":{"name":"2022 7th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 7th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Metal Matrix Composite materials (MMC) are usually made by dispersing a reinforcing material embedded and completely continuous in a monolithic material or metal matrix. The reinforcing material can be metal, ceramic or an organic compound that provides the MMC with an increase in stiffness, strength, conductivity, corrosion resistance, thermal properties, wear resistance and fatigue life. Its manufacture requires considerable energy and raw material, since the matrix material must be fused in a furnace. In recent years, the valuation of waste, as well as the reduction of the impact of the product or process on the environment, has forced the use of some material waste for the manufacture of new composite materials. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool that is used to evaluate the consumption of energy and raw materials, and the impact of waste and emissions of a product or process on the environment. This work proposes a comprehensive studio to determine the yield stress, tensile strength and toughness, as well as the LCA of the manufacturing process of a novel composite material that is composed of EN AW 6082 recycled aluminum alloy matrix reinforced with bidirectional continuous fibers of AISI 304 stainless steel. Five wire diameters and wires spacing oriented at 0°were studied. These were: Ø0.32 mm x 1.41 mm, Ø0.5 mm x 1.81 mm; Ø0.6 mm x 2.177 mm; Ø0.75 mm x 2.72 mm and Ø0.8 mm x 2.7828 mm. The results were compared to those of unreinforced EN AW 6082 recycled aluminum matrix without its bidirectional continuous fibers. The combination of wire diameter wire spacing of 0.8 mm x 2.828 mm provided an increase in tensile strength of 136% over than of unreinforced aluminum. Moreover, the combination of Ø0.32 mm x 1.41 mm and Ø0.8 mm x 2.828 mm gave an increase in toughness of 25%, whereas the combination of Ø0.6 mm x 2.177 mm gave an increase in toughness of 175%. Also, some of the environmental impacts of the manufacturing process of the proposed MMC for each of the five diameters and wires spacing studied hardly varied considerably with respect to unreinforced aluminum. The combination of Ø0.8 mm x 2.828 mm is the one that generates the greatest environmental impact, showing an increase of 2.47%, 0.49%, 30.62% and 50.20% for the abiotic depletion, global warming, human toxicity and acidification respectively. From the results obtained from yield stress, tensile strength and toughness, as well as the LCA of the manufacturing process, it can be stated that the novel MMC proposed in this study has a significant load capacity, both static and dynamic, capable of revaluing a metallic waste, while its manufacturing cost is reduced compared to the manufacturing cost of other MMCs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不锈钢双向连续纤维增强再生铝基复合材料(MMC)的生命周期评价
金属基复合材料(MMC)通常是通过将增强材料分散并完全连续地嵌入到单片材料或金属基体中而制成的。增强材料可以是金属、陶瓷或有机化合物,可以提高MMC的刚度、强度、导电性、耐腐蚀性、热性能、耐磨性和疲劳寿命。它的制造需要大量的能源和原材料,因为基体材料必须在熔炉中熔化。近年来,对废物的评估,以及减少产品或工艺对环境的影响,迫使一些材料废物用于制造新的复合材料。生命周期评价(LCA)是一种用于评价能源和原材料消耗以及产品或过程的废物和排放对环境的影响的工具。这项工作提出了一个综合工作室,以确定一种新型复合材料的屈服应力,抗拉强度和韧性,以及制造过程的LCA,该复合材料由EN aw6082再生铝合金基体和双向连续纤维增强的AISI 304不锈钢组成。研究了0°取向的5种线径和线间距。分别是:Ø0.32 mm x 1.41 mm, Ø0.5 mm x 1.81 mm;Ø0.6 mm x 2.177 mm;Ø0.75 mm × 2.72 mm和Ø0.8 mm × 2.7828 mm。并与未加双向连续纤维的EN aw6082再生铝基进行了对比。与未增强铝相比,0.8 mm × 2.828 mm的线径线间距组合的抗拉强度提高了136%。此外,Ø0.32 mm x 1.41 mm和Ø0.8 mm x 2.828 mm的组合使韧性增加了25%,而Ø0.6 mm x 2.177 mm的组合使韧性增加了175%。此外,对于所研究的五种直径和线间距的MMC制造过程中的一些环境影响,与未增强铝相比几乎没有太大变化。Ø0.8 mm x 2.828 mm的组合对环境的影响最大,对非生物耗损、全球变暖、人体毒性和酸化的影响分别增加了2.47%、0.49%、30.62%和50.20%。从屈服应力、抗拉强度和韧性以及制造过程的LCA结果可以看出,本研究提出的新型MMC具有显著的静态和动态载荷能力,能够对金属废物进行重估,同时与其他MMC相比,其制造成本降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS: At a Glance Towards real time monitoring of an aeronautical machining process using scalable technologies Predicting TV Viewership with Regression Models Towards Consumer-Oriented Demand Response Systems RFID Thermal Monitoring Sheet (R-TMS) for Skin Temperature Measurements during Superficial Microwave Hyperthermia Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1