{"title":"Stevie Smith","authors":"J. Underwood","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781789621822.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"James Underwood supplements recent scholarship on the poetry of Stevie Smith by focusing on the problem of personality. One word that has come to be associated with Smith and her work is ‘eccentric’. Whilst certain variations on this word may be intended as praise, the perception of eccentricity has been offered in lieu of actual integration into twentieth-century literary history. The essay opens up Kristin Bluemel’s argument that we require an entirely new category of literary history to properly comprehend the achievement of an intermodernist writer like Smith. Philip Larkin’s intervention in reviewing Smith’s work and later in creating an archive at the University of Hull is assessed alongside her own seizing of the means of production by the performance of her poetry and her personality in the early 1960s, a move which enhanced her poetic reputation at the same time as it played to the reputation she was given.","PeriodicalId":348231,"journal":{"name":"British Women's Writing, 1930 to 1960","volume":"417 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Women's Writing, 1930 to 1960","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621822.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

James Underwood supplements recent scholarship on the poetry of Stevie Smith by focusing on the problem of personality. One word that has come to be associated with Smith and her work is ‘eccentric’. Whilst certain variations on this word may be intended as praise, the perception of eccentricity has been offered in lieu of actual integration into twentieth-century literary history. The essay opens up Kristin Bluemel’s argument that we require an entirely new category of literary history to properly comprehend the achievement of an intermodernist writer like Smith. Philip Larkin’s intervention in reviewing Smith’s work and later in creating an archive at the University of Hull is assessed alongside her own seizing of the means of production by the performance of her poetry and her personality in the early 1960s, a move which enhanced her poetic reputation at the same time as it played to the reputation she was given.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
史蒂夫史密斯
詹姆斯·安德伍德通过关注人格问题补充了最近关于史蒂夫·史密斯诗歌的学术研究。与史密斯和她的作品联系在一起的一个词是“古怪的”。虽然这个词的某些变体可能是为了赞美,但古怪的感觉已经被提供,而不是真正融入20世纪的文学史。这篇文章开启了Kristin Bluemel的论点,即我们需要一个全新的文学史类别来正确理解像史密斯这样的现代主义作家的成就。菲利普·拉金对史密斯作品的评论以及后来在赫尔大学建立档案的介入与她对生产手段的掌握一起被评估通过她在20世纪60年代早期的诗歌表现和她的个性,这一举动在提升她的诗歌声誉的同时也发挥了她被赋予的声誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stevie Smith British Women Writing War ‘Unsettled and Unsettling’ Women: British Women Writing War: Barbara Comyns and New Directions in Women’s Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1