Russian monarchism at the beginning of the 20th century through the prism of ideological approaches: a typology of historiographical models

B. Chernyshov
{"title":"Russian monarchism at the beginning of the 20th century through the prism of ideological approaches: a typology of historiographical models","authors":"B. Chernyshov","doi":"10.18384/2310-676x-2022-2-121-131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To identify the main model approaches to the interpretation of the ideology and organizational practice of Russian monarchism at the beginning of the 20th century. To carry out a correlation of the put forward assessments of the monarchical movement with ideological and philosophical-historical paradigms.Methodology. The study used the methodology of humanitarian modeling. On the basis of a wide range of historiographical and historical-journalistic sources, general characteristics were singled out in understanding the history of Russian monarchism from the standpoint of different models. Correlation of these models with the directions of ideological discourse was carried out.Results. Five historiographic models for representing the ideology and political activity of the Russian monarchist movement were described. It is concluded that there is an increase in the demand for appeals to the ideas of Russian monarchists of the early 20th century, a tendency is found to move from a predominantly negative to a positive coverage of the activities of monarchist organizations.Research implications. The description of historiographic models can serve as a typological map for further research on the problems of the history of Russian monarchism. The results of the work may also be in demand in the formation of a new ideological agenda for the development of Russia.","PeriodicalId":389297,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (History and Political Science)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (History and Political Science)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676x-2022-2-121-131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To identify the main model approaches to the interpretation of the ideology and organizational practice of Russian monarchism at the beginning of the 20th century. To carry out a correlation of the put forward assessments of the monarchical movement with ideological and philosophical-historical paradigms.Methodology. The study used the methodology of humanitarian modeling. On the basis of a wide range of historiographical and historical-journalistic sources, general characteristics were singled out in understanding the history of Russian monarchism from the standpoint of different models. Correlation of these models with the directions of ideological discourse was carried out.Results. Five historiographic models for representing the ideology and political activity of the Russian monarchist movement were described. It is concluded that there is an increase in the demand for appeals to the ideas of Russian monarchists of the early 20th century, a tendency is found to move from a predominantly negative to a positive coverage of the activities of monarchist organizations.Research implications. The description of historiographic models can serve as a typological map for further research on the problems of the history of Russian monarchism. The results of the work may also be in demand in the formation of a new ideological agenda for the development of Russia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过意识形态方法的棱镜研究20世纪初的俄国君主制:一种史学模型的类型学
的目标。找出解释20世纪初俄国君主主义意识形态和组织实践的主要模式方法。将所提出的对君主运动的评价与思想和哲学史的范式、方法论联系起来。本研究采用人道主义建模方法。在广泛的史学和历史新闻资料的基础上,从不同模式的角度来理解俄罗斯君主主义的历史,找出了一般特征。对这些模式与意识形态话语方向进行了相关性分析。描述了代表俄国君主主义运动的意识形态和政治活动的五种史学模型。结论是,对20世纪初俄罗斯君主主义思想诉求的需求有所增加,发现对君主主义组织活动的报道从主要的负面转向积极的趋势。研究的意义。史学模式的描述可以作为进一步研究俄罗斯君主主义历史问题的类型学地图。这项工作的结果也可能在形成俄罗斯发展的新意识形态议程方面有所需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
«Prague spring» or «color revolution»? (Evolution of the official evaluation of the Czechoslovak events in 1968) Indian National Congress in the years of the Curzon’s government (1899–1905): problems of development Social deviations in the USSR in the period of the Great Patriotic War: from adultery to high treason The policy of the government of Alexander III in soviet history textbooks for higher education Milestones in the evolution of regional representative government in the Rostov region (1985–2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1