Hiding to hedge against information overload

Yannick Runge, C. Frings, Tobias Tempel
{"title":"Hiding to hedge against information overload","authors":"Yannick Runge, C. Frings, Tobias Tempel","doi":"10.30844/AIS-TES.V4I1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many workspaces nowadays overload people with information – often with information that is irrelevant to the task at hand. Such information cannot only be distracting but additionally misleading, and can potentially impair the performance in relevant tasks. Here we set out to investigate how higher order cognition is influenced by such irrelevant or misleading information. Specifically we were interested in disentangling distraction effects due to task-irrelevant information from distraction effects due to misleading associations. To this end, we examined the solution rates for Remote Associates Test (RAT) items as a function of the presence of additional irrelevant or misleading word material, presented alongside the RAT items. Solving these kinds of word riddles is considered higher cognition as it is closely related to problem solving in real world scenarios. Additionally we manipulated the expectation of participants towards the nature of additional information across two experiments. In Experiment 1 participants believed that all additional words were irrelevant. In Experiment 2 they thought some of the information might be useful for their task. Alongside other manipulations we hereby ensured an attentional focus on the additional information in Experiment 2. Results showed, participants performed poorer in solving RAT items when irrelevant or misleading words were presented along with the RAT items compared to no additional presentation. Moreover misleading information was additionally interfering, but only if attentively processed. To avoid such distraction and misdirection, future personal information systems like the Semantic Desktop [1-2] can help by detecting and hiding temporarily irrelevant or misleading information.","PeriodicalId":240019,"journal":{"name":"AIS Transactions on Enterprise Systems","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIS Transactions on Enterprise Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30844/AIS-TES.V4I1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many workspaces nowadays overload people with information – often with information that is irrelevant to the task at hand. Such information cannot only be distracting but additionally misleading, and can potentially impair the performance in relevant tasks. Here we set out to investigate how higher order cognition is influenced by such irrelevant or misleading information. Specifically we were interested in disentangling distraction effects due to task-irrelevant information from distraction effects due to misleading associations. To this end, we examined the solution rates for Remote Associates Test (RAT) items as a function of the presence of additional irrelevant or misleading word material, presented alongside the RAT items. Solving these kinds of word riddles is considered higher cognition as it is closely related to problem solving in real world scenarios. Additionally we manipulated the expectation of participants towards the nature of additional information across two experiments. In Experiment 1 participants believed that all additional words were irrelevant. In Experiment 2 they thought some of the information might be useful for their task. Alongside other manipulations we hereby ensured an attentional focus on the additional information in Experiment 2. Results showed, participants performed poorer in solving RAT items when irrelevant or misleading words were presented along with the RAT items compared to no additional presentation. Moreover misleading information was additionally interfering, but only if attentively processed. To avoid such distraction and misdirection, future personal information systems like the Semantic Desktop [1-2] can help by detecting and hiding temporarily irrelevant or misleading information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐藏是为了避免信息过载
如今,许多工作场所都给人们带来了过多的信息,而这些信息往往与手头的任务无关。这些信息不仅会分散注意力,还会产生误导,并可能影响相关任务的表现。在这里,我们着手调查高阶认知如何受到这些不相关或误导性信息的影响。我们特别感兴趣的是将与任务无关的信息引起的注意力分散效应与误导性联想引起的注意力分散效应区分开来。为此,我们检查了远程联想测试(RAT)项目的解决率,作为与RAT项目一起呈现的额外不相关或误导性单词材料的存在的函数。解决这类字谜被认为是更高的认知能力,因为它与现实世界中的问题解决密切相关。此外,我们在两个实验中操纵了参与者对附加信息性质的期望。在实验1中,参与者认为所有额外的单词都是不相关的。在实验二中,他们认为一些信息可能对他们的任务有用。除了其他操作外,我们在此确保将注意力集中在实验2中的附加信息上。结果表明,与没有额外呈现相比,当不相关或误导性词语与RAT项目一起呈现时,参与者在解决RAT项目方面的表现较差。此外,误导信息也有干扰作用,但只有仔细处理。为了避免这种干扰和误导,未来的个人信息系统,如语义桌面[1-2]可以通过检测和隐藏暂时无关或误导性的信息来提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Success Factors in Efficient Mergers & Acquisitions Activities: A Longitudinal Case Study from a Serial Acquirer and Divestor On the Journey to AI Maturity: Understanding the Role of Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Service Hiding to hedge against information overload A Web-Based Information System to Evaluate Different Versions of IT Artefacts in Online Experiments Evaluation of Self-Reflection Training to Uncover Tacit Knowledge in a Learning Organization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1