Suicide reporting in electronic and print media; An observational study

Yogya Akkineni, A. Kakunje
{"title":"Suicide reporting in electronic and print media; An observational study","authors":"Yogya Akkineni, A. Kakunje","doi":"10.4103/jopsys.jopsys_12_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Suicide is one of the leading causes of death in India. The effect of suicide reporting in mass media like print and digital platforms is prominent as its reach is vast, fast, and impacts different kinds of individuals. We aimed to analyze suicide reporting in India in national and regional newspapers and electronic media. Materials and Methods: Suicide reporting in six national and regional newspapers and one online english news portal in India were studied by the first author from August to November 2020 after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. All the suicide reports from the mentioned newspapers and online web portal were considered on all days of the month and inspection was done manually and compared against ten points of a standard reporting after evaluating various guidelines on suicide reporting. The percentage-wise compliance of the suicide reporting guidelines was deciphered and inferential analysis was conducted. Results: Nearly 100% of all the suicide reports were non-compliant in at least one of the parameters. The parameter with the maximum non-compliance was “Suicide Helpline,” i.e., 98% of the analyzed reports did not mention any means to seek help or did not provide adequate information to do so. About 94% of the reports mentioned personal information in one way or other while 86% of the reports attributed the suicide to one particular stressor. The total non-compliance score for print and electronic media was 58% and 61%, respectively. The non-compliance score of both national level print newspapers and that of regional-level print newspapers was 58%. Conclusion: Given the high rates of non-compliance to suicide reporting guidelines by the print and electronic media, they need to be sensitized to the responsibility they carry regarding suicide reporting and the guidelines can only be formulated as a collaborative effort between media personnel and health care professionals to achieve their common goal.","PeriodicalId":262035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry Spectrum","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jopsys.jopsys_12_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicide is one of the leading causes of death in India. The effect of suicide reporting in mass media like print and digital platforms is prominent as its reach is vast, fast, and impacts different kinds of individuals. We aimed to analyze suicide reporting in India in national and regional newspapers and electronic media. Materials and Methods: Suicide reporting in six national and regional newspapers and one online english news portal in India were studied by the first author from August to November 2020 after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. All the suicide reports from the mentioned newspapers and online web portal were considered on all days of the month and inspection was done manually and compared against ten points of a standard reporting after evaluating various guidelines on suicide reporting. The percentage-wise compliance of the suicide reporting guidelines was deciphered and inferential analysis was conducted. Results: Nearly 100% of all the suicide reports were non-compliant in at least one of the parameters. The parameter with the maximum non-compliance was “Suicide Helpline,” i.e., 98% of the analyzed reports did not mention any means to seek help or did not provide adequate information to do so. About 94% of the reports mentioned personal information in one way or other while 86% of the reports attributed the suicide to one particular stressor. The total non-compliance score for print and electronic media was 58% and 61%, respectively. The non-compliance score of both national level print newspapers and that of regional-level print newspapers was 58%. Conclusion: Given the high rates of non-compliance to suicide reporting guidelines by the print and electronic media, they need to be sensitized to the responsibility they carry regarding suicide reporting and the guidelines can only be formulated as a collaborative effort between media personnel and health care professionals to achieve their common goal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子和印刷媒体的自杀报告;观察性研究
背景:自杀是印度死亡的主要原因之一。在印刷和数字平台等大众媒体上,自杀报道的影响是突出的,因为它的覆盖范围大,速度快,影响不同类型的人。我们的目的是分析印度国家和地区报纸和电子媒体上的自杀报道。材料与方法:第一作者在获得机构伦理委员会批准后,于2020年8月至11月对印度六家全国性和区域性报纸以及一家在线英语新闻门户网站的自杀报道进行研究。所有上述报纸和网络门户网站的自杀报告都是在一个月的所有日子里进行审查,并进行人工检查,并在评估各种自杀报告指南后与标准报告的10分进行比较。对自杀报告指南的百分比依从性进行了解读,并进行了推理分析。结果:几乎100%的自杀报告至少有一个参数不符合要求。最不遵守的参数是“自杀求助热线”,即98%的分析报告没有提及任何寻求帮助的方法或没有提供足够的信息。大约94%的报告以这样或那样的方式提到了个人信息,而86%的报告将自杀归因于一个特定的压力源。印刷媒体和电子媒体的总不合规得分分别为58%和61%。国家级纸媒报纸和地区级纸媒报纸的不合规得分均为58%。结论:鉴于纸媒和电子媒体不遵守自杀报告指南的比例很高,他们需要意识到自己在自杀报告方面所承担的责任,只有媒体人员和卫生保健专业人员共同努力才能制定指南,以实现他们的共同目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trihexyphenidyl Use Disorder and Withdrawal Syndrome Cognitive Benefits of Physical Activity in the Elderly: A Narrative Review Development and Validation of Brief Family Intervention for Young Adults with Substance Use Disorder: A Qualitative Study Skin Picking as a Form of Non-Suicidal Self-Harm in a Patient with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Case Report Is the United Kingdom’s National Health Service Encouraging Stigmatized, Discriminatory, Fragmented, and Expensive Specialist Psychiatric Care?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1