5 The difficult art of un-doing

J. Brodersen, I. Heath, G. Roksund, H. Sundby, E. Swensen
{"title":"5 The difficult art of un-doing","authors":"J. Brodersen, I. Heath, G. Roksund, H. Sundby, E. Swensen","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evidence for overdiagnosis and overtreatment within medicine is growing: across disciplines and across the globe. Clinicians and their patients must now face the challenge of integrating this new knowledge into the realities of their everyday practice and the numerous decisions about investigation, labelling and treatment that have to be taken. While patients seek more involvement and more balanced information, professionals too often struggle with lack of confidence and lack of political and legal support in proceeding slowly and carefully. While winding back the harms of too much medicine is a noble cause, the very real fear of making mistakes continues to push doctors, and perhaps especially younger colleagues, towards acting precipitately and unthinkingly. This symposium will offer a theoretical framework for the ‘de-implementation’ of both screening and treatments that cause harm or do not improve outcomes for patients. We will present new thinking and a new vocabulary for a new practice. We will then describe clinical examples from everyday general practice to demonstrate how new knowledge on overdiagnosis/overtreatment can be integrated within shared decision-making in the consultation. Finally there will be an interactive role play on overdiagnosis/overtreatment, based on experiences from teaching and training medical students at the University of Trondheim, Norway. Objectives The symposium will offer a theoretical framework and demonstrate practical clinical examples for the ‘de-implementation’ of diagnostic processes and treatments that cause harm or do not improve outcomes for patients. Method In the symposium the presenters will share new thinking and a new vocabulary for a new practice. We will then describe clinical examples from everyday general practice to demonstrate how new knowledge on overdiagnosis/overtreatment can be integrated within shared decision-making in the consultation. Finally there will be an interactive role play on overdiagnosis/overtreatment, based on experiences from teaching and training medical students. Results Interactive session aimed at sharing theoretical reflections and clinical GP experience from. Conclusions Interactive session aimed at sharing theoretical reflections and clinical GP experience.","PeriodicalId":298595,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evidence for overdiagnosis and overtreatment within medicine is growing: across disciplines and across the globe. Clinicians and their patients must now face the challenge of integrating this new knowledge into the realities of their everyday practice and the numerous decisions about investigation, labelling and treatment that have to be taken. While patients seek more involvement and more balanced information, professionals too often struggle with lack of confidence and lack of political and legal support in proceeding slowly and carefully. While winding back the harms of too much medicine is a noble cause, the very real fear of making mistakes continues to push doctors, and perhaps especially younger colleagues, towards acting precipitately and unthinkingly. This symposium will offer a theoretical framework for the ‘de-implementation’ of both screening and treatments that cause harm or do not improve outcomes for patients. We will present new thinking and a new vocabulary for a new practice. We will then describe clinical examples from everyday general practice to demonstrate how new knowledge on overdiagnosis/overtreatment can be integrated within shared decision-making in the consultation. Finally there will be an interactive role play on overdiagnosis/overtreatment, based on experiences from teaching and training medical students at the University of Trondheim, Norway. Objectives The symposium will offer a theoretical framework and demonstrate practical clinical examples for the ‘de-implementation’ of diagnostic processes and treatments that cause harm or do not improve outcomes for patients. Method In the symposium the presenters will share new thinking and a new vocabulary for a new practice. We will then describe clinical examples from everyday general practice to demonstrate how new knowledge on overdiagnosis/overtreatment can be integrated within shared decision-making in the consultation. Finally there will be an interactive role play on overdiagnosis/overtreatment, based on experiences from teaching and training medical students. Results Interactive session aimed at sharing theoretical reflections and clinical GP experience from. Conclusions Interactive session aimed at sharing theoretical reflections and clinical GP experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5 .难以挽回的艺术
医学领域的过度诊断和过度治疗的证据越来越多:跨越学科和全球。临床医生和他们的患者现在必须面对将这些新知识整合到日常实践中的挑战,以及必须采取的关于调查、标签和治疗的众多决定。当患者寻求更多的参与和更平衡的信息时,专业人员往往因为缺乏信心和缺乏政治和法律支持而在缓慢而谨慎的过程中挣扎。虽然减少过多药物的危害是一项崇高的事业,但对犯错的真正恐惧继续推动医生,尤其是年轻的同事,采取轻率和不假思索的行动。本次研讨会将为对患者造成伤害或不能改善结果的筛查和治疗的“去实施”提供一个理论框架。我们将为新的练习呈现新的思维和新的词汇。然后,我们将描述日常全科实践中的临床例子,以展示如何将有关过度诊断/过度治疗的新知识整合到会诊的共同决策中。最后,将根据挪威特隆赫姆大学医学生的教学和培训经验,就过度诊断/过度治疗问题进行互动角色扮演。研讨会将提供一个理论框架,并展示实际的临床实例,以“去实施”对患者造成伤害或不能改善结果的诊断过程和治疗。方法在研讨会上,演讲者将分享新的思维和新的词汇,以进行新的实践。然后,我们将描述日常全科实践中的临床例子,以展示如何将有关过度诊断/过度治疗的新知识整合到会诊的共同决策中。最后,将根据医学生的教学和培训经验,就过度诊断/过度治疗进行互动角色扮演。结果互动式会议旨在分享理论反思和临床全科医生经验。互动式会议旨在分享理论思考和临床全科医生经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
57 On the relevance of definitions: three conceptually challenging issues in overdiagnosis 80 Overdiagnosis and error in general practice: the need of a new approach 110 External validity of thromboprophylaxis guidelines in hip fracture patients: a retrospective analysis 33 A tale of two studies: diagnostic algorithms and clinical practice guidelines minimize overdiagnosis and overtreatment and maximize survival in lung cancer screening 116 The surveillance interval of follow-up colonoscopy after an initial colonoscopy: a retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1