Credit vs. Exemption: A Comparative Study of Double Tax Relief in the United States and Japan

Lawrence Lokken, Y. Kitamura
{"title":"Credit vs. Exemption: A Comparative Study of Double Tax Relief in the United States and Japan","authors":"Lawrence Lokken, Y. Kitamura","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1757990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States and elsewhere, basic principles of international taxation have, in recent years, become the subject of vigorous debate and controversy. Historically, the United States has taxed residents, including domestic corporations, on worldwide income, but has allowed them credit for foreign income taxes in order to alleviate double taxation. Other countries, particularly countries of continental Europe, have long used an exemption system under which income from foreign business activities is exempted from home-country tax, while passive investment income is taxed with a worldwide/credit system similar to that of the United States. Recently, several countries that historically had worldwide/credit systems switched to exemption systems. Some scholars, business representatives, and politicians argue that the United States should do the same. This article examines the law of one such country, Japan, and compares the existing U.S. system with the new Japanese exemption system. A principal conclusion of the article is that a simple switch by the United States, without other corrective changes, would open up tax minimization and avoidance opportunities that are not available to Japanese companies, even after the recent changes in Japanese law.","PeriodicalId":136236,"journal":{"name":"University of Miami School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Miami School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1757990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the United States and elsewhere, basic principles of international taxation have, in recent years, become the subject of vigorous debate and controversy. Historically, the United States has taxed residents, including domestic corporations, on worldwide income, but has allowed them credit for foreign income taxes in order to alleviate double taxation. Other countries, particularly countries of continental Europe, have long used an exemption system under which income from foreign business activities is exempted from home-country tax, while passive investment income is taxed with a worldwide/credit system similar to that of the United States. Recently, several countries that historically had worldwide/credit systems switched to exemption systems. Some scholars, business representatives, and politicians argue that the United States should do the same. This article examines the law of one such country, Japan, and compares the existing U.S. system with the new Japanese exemption system. A principal conclusion of the article is that a simple switch by the United States, without other corrective changes, would open up tax minimization and avoidance opportunities that are not available to Japanese companies, even after the recent changes in Japanese law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信用与豁免:美国与日本双重税收减免的比较研究
近年来,在美国和其他地方,国际税收的基本原则已成为激烈辩论和争议的主题。从历史上看,美国对居民(包括国内公司)的全球收入征税,但允许他们抵免外国所得税,以减轻双重征税。其他国家,特别是欧洲大陆国家,长期以来一直采用一种豁免制度,根据这种制度,外国商业活动的收入免征母国税,而被动投资收入则按照与美国类似的全球/信贷制度征税。最近,一些历史上拥有全球信用体系的国家转向了豁免体系。一些学者、商界代表和政界人士认为,美国也应该这样做。本文考察了其中一个国家——日本的法律,并比较了美国现有的制度和日本新的豁免制度。这篇文章的一个主要结论是,美国的一个简单转变,如果没有其他纠正性的改变,将为日本公司提供税收最小化和避税的机会,即使在日本法律最近发生了变化之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Should Psychopathy Qualify for Preventive Outpatient Commitment? Theatre and Revolution in Clinical Legal Education Building Privacy into the Infrastructure: Towards a New Identity Management Architecture Credit vs. Exemption: A Comparative Study of Double Tax Relief in the United States and Japan Sale of Business Assets: Contingent Liabilities and Economic Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1