The Seductive Allure of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Neurotechnology

C. Giattino, Lydia Kwong, Chad Rafetto, Nita A. Farahany
{"title":"The Seductive Allure of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Neurotechnology","authors":"C. Giattino, Lydia Kwong, Chad Rafetto, Nita A. Farahany","doi":"10.1145/3306618.3314269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuroscience explanations-even when completely irrelevant-have been shown to exert a \"seductive allure\" on individuals, leading them to judge bad explanations or arguments more favorably. There seems to be a similarly seductive allure for artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, leading people to \"overtrust\" these systems, even when they have just witnessed the system perform poorly. The AI-powered neurotechnologies that have begun to proliferate in recent years, particularly those based on electroencephalography (EEG), represent a potentially doubly-alluring combination. While there is enormous potential benefit in applying AI techniques in neuroscience to \"decode\" brain activity and associated mental states, these efforts are still in the early stages, and there is a danger in using these unproven technologies prematurely, especially in important, real-world contexts. Yet, such premature use has begun to emerge in several high-stakes set-tings, including the law, health & wellness, employment, and transportation. In light of the potential seductive allure of these technologies, we need to be vigilant in monitoring their scientific validity and challenging both unsubstantiated claims and misuse, while still actively supporting their continued development and proper use.","PeriodicalId":418125,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Neuroscience explanations-even when completely irrelevant-have been shown to exert a "seductive allure" on individuals, leading them to judge bad explanations or arguments more favorably. There seems to be a similarly seductive allure for artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, leading people to "overtrust" these systems, even when they have just witnessed the system perform poorly. The AI-powered neurotechnologies that have begun to proliferate in recent years, particularly those based on electroencephalography (EEG), represent a potentially doubly-alluring combination. While there is enormous potential benefit in applying AI techniques in neuroscience to "decode" brain activity and associated mental states, these efforts are still in the early stages, and there is a danger in using these unproven technologies prematurely, especially in important, real-world contexts. Yet, such premature use has begun to emerge in several high-stakes set-tings, including the law, health & wellness, employment, and transportation. In light of the potential seductive allure of these technologies, we need to be vigilant in monitoring their scientific validity and challenging both unsubstantiated claims and misuse, while still actively supporting their continued development and proper use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能驱动的神经技术的诱人诱惑
神经科学的解释——即使是完全不相关的——已经被证明对个人产生了“诱人的吸引力”,导致他们更倾向于判断错误的解释或论点。人工智能(AI)技术似乎也有类似的诱人诱惑,导致人们“过度信任”这些系统,即使他们刚刚看到系统表现不佳。近年来,人工智能驱动的神经技术已经开始激增,特别是那些基于脑电图(EEG)的神经技术,代表了一种潜在的双重吸引力。虽然在神经科学中应用人工智能技术来“解码”大脑活动和相关的精神状态有巨大的潜在好处,但这些努力仍处于早期阶段,过早使用这些未经证实的技术存在危险,特别是在重要的现实环境中。然而,这种过早的使用已经开始出现在一些高风险的环境中,包括法律、医疗保健、就业和交通运输。鉴于这些技术的潜在诱惑,我们需要保持警惕,监测它们的科学有效性,挑战未经证实的说法和滥用,同时仍然积极支持它们的继续发展和适当使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Semantics Derived Automatically from Language Corpora Contain Human-like Moral Choices Requirements for an Artificial Agent with Norm Competence Enabling Effective Transparency: Towards User-Centric Intelligent Systems Killer Robots and Human Dignity The Value of Trustworthy AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1