Naomi Mitchison’s Rationalist ‘Heresy’ and Speculative Humanism in Beyond This Limit

S. Hobson
{"title":"Naomi Mitchison’s Rationalist ‘Heresy’ and Speculative Humanism in Beyond This Limit","authors":"S. Hobson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192846471.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 5 examines Naomi Mitchison’s claim to be a Rationalist heretic and her attempts to reshape Rationalist priorities and values to better serve a new generation of left-leaning and feminist unbelievers such as herself. Mitchison was a life-long member of the Rationalist Press Association, though not always supportive of its aims. In articles and speeches, some of which were published in the RPA journal, she argued for a realignment of Rationalism to bring it closer to socialism, on the one hand, and, curiously, religion on the other. This was not, this chapter argues, a wholesale abandonment of Rationalist principles, especially not those concerning the limits of human knowledge. On the contrary, Mitchison re-orientates Rationalism in the direction of a speculative humanism that goes beyond the confines of scientific naturalism without sacrificing the primacy of human reason to some other, extra-human or godlike, way of knowing. This chapter turns to Beyond This Limit, the short novel Mitchison co-created with Wyndham Lewis, to explore the working out of her philosophy in fiction. Beyond This Limit posits the existence of an afterlife but in such a way as to suggest, that if this is to be a legitimate and rational form of conjecture, then the afterlife can only be imagined as an extension of the conditions of mortality—as a form of living on.","PeriodicalId":119552,"journal":{"name":"Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846471.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 5 examines Naomi Mitchison’s claim to be a Rationalist heretic and her attempts to reshape Rationalist priorities and values to better serve a new generation of left-leaning and feminist unbelievers such as herself. Mitchison was a life-long member of the Rationalist Press Association, though not always supportive of its aims. In articles and speeches, some of which were published in the RPA journal, she argued for a realignment of Rationalism to bring it closer to socialism, on the one hand, and, curiously, religion on the other. This was not, this chapter argues, a wholesale abandonment of Rationalist principles, especially not those concerning the limits of human knowledge. On the contrary, Mitchison re-orientates Rationalism in the direction of a speculative humanism that goes beyond the confines of scientific naturalism without sacrificing the primacy of human reason to some other, extra-human or godlike, way of knowing. This chapter turns to Beyond This Limit, the short novel Mitchison co-created with Wyndham Lewis, to explore the working out of her philosophy in fiction. Beyond This Limit posits the existence of an afterlife but in such a way as to suggest, that if this is to be a legitimate and rational form of conjecture, then the afterlife can only be imagined as an extension of the conditions of mortality—as a form of living on.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米契森的理性主义“异端”与《超越这一极限》中的思辨人文主义
第五章探讨了Naomi Mitchison自称为理性主义异端,以及她试图重塑理性主义的优先级和价值观,以更好地服务于像她这样的左倾和女权主义不信仰者的新一代。米奇逊是理性主义新闻协会的终身会员,尽管他并不总是支持该协会的宗旨。在一些发表在RPA杂志上的文章和演讲中,她主张重新调整理性主义,一方面使其更接近社会主义,另一方面,奇怪的是,更接近宗教。本章认为,这并不是对理性主义原则的全盘抛弃,尤其是对那些涉及人类知识极限的原则。相反,米奇逊将理性主义重新定位在一种思辨的人文主义的方向上,这种人文主义超越了科学自然主义的界限,而不牺牲人类理性的首要地位,以某种其他的、超人类的或神一般的认识方式。本章将转向与温德姆·刘易斯共同创作的短篇小说《超越极限》(Beyond This Limit),探讨她的小说哲学。超越这一极限假设了来世的存在,但以这样一种方式暗示,如果这是一种合法和合理的猜测形式,那么来世只能被想象为死亡条件的延伸——作为一种生存形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Naomi Mitchison’s Rationalist ‘Heresy’ and Speculative Humanism in Beyond This Limit The Ethics of Unbelief in Vernon Lee and William James The ‘Death of God’ in New Testament Biofiction H. G. Wells’s ‘Theological Excursion’ and the Dialogue Novel Conclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1