10 Years after Tufte's "Cognitive Style of PowerPoint": Synthesizing its Constraining Qualities

S. Kernbach, Sabrina Bresciani
{"title":"10 Years after Tufte's \"Cognitive Style of PowerPoint\": Synthesizing its Constraining Qualities","authors":"S. Kernbach, Sabrina Bresciani","doi":"10.1109/IV.2013.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PowerPoint is a tool that is very often used in organization to visualize knowledge. It is seemingly simple but a complex tool which is not 'neutral' but has enabling and constraining qualities. Despite its pervasiveness, research on PowerPoint is scarce, fragmented and often polemic. Given its omnipresence and importance, a more appropriate understanding of the tool is needed. This paper aims to contribute toward this goal by conducting a literature review on the constraining qualities of PowerPoint in a systematic manner. The results are synthesized into 12 constraining qualities and classified into two levels: the tool itself and the enactment of the tool in the performance. Through the synthesis and description of the constraining qualities and their negative effects, this paper aims to provide guidance to practitioners for the preparation, performance and reception of PowerPoint presentations, with the ultimate goal to select and use this presentation tool more consciously, or to select other tools for knowledge visualization.","PeriodicalId":354135,"journal":{"name":"2013 17th International Conference on Information Visualisation","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 17th International Conference on Information Visualisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2013.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

PowerPoint is a tool that is very often used in organization to visualize knowledge. It is seemingly simple but a complex tool which is not 'neutral' but has enabling and constraining qualities. Despite its pervasiveness, research on PowerPoint is scarce, fragmented and often polemic. Given its omnipresence and importance, a more appropriate understanding of the tool is needed. This paper aims to contribute toward this goal by conducting a literature review on the constraining qualities of PowerPoint in a systematic manner. The results are synthesized into 12 constraining qualities and classified into two levels: the tool itself and the enactment of the tool in the performance. Through the synthesis and description of the constraining qualities and their negative effects, this paper aims to provide guidance to practitioners for the preparation, performance and reception of PowerPoint presentations, with the ultimate goal to select and use this presentation tool more consciously, or to select other tools for knowledge visualization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔夫特“ppt的认知风格”10年后:综合其约束品质
ppt是组织中经常使用的可视化知识的工具。它看似简单,但却是一个复杂的工具,它不是“中立的”,而是具有启用和约束的特性。尽管ppt无处不在,但对它的研究却很少,支离破碎,而且常常争论不休。考虑到它的无所不在和重要性,需要对该工具有更恰当的理解。本文旨在通过系统地对PowerPoint的约束质量进行文献综述,为实现这一目标做出贡献。结果被综合为12个约束品质,并分为两个层面:工具本身和工具在表演中的发挥。本文旨在通过对这些约束品质及其负面影响的综合描述,为从业者准备、表演和接受ppt演示提供指导,最终达到更有意识地选择和使用ppt演示工具,或者选择其他工具进行知识可视化的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D and Immersive Interfaces for Business Intelligence: The Case of OLAP Magic Squares and Aesthetic Events EyeC: Coordinated Views for Interactive Visual Exploration of Eye-Tracking Data Developing a Novel Approach for 3D Visualisation of Tarland Graph-Based Relational Data Visualization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1