Evaluation of Quantified Statements Using Gradual Numbers

L. Lietard, D. Rocacher
{"title":"Evaluation of Quantified Statements Using Gradual Numbers","authors":"L. Lietard, D. Rocacher","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-853-6.CH010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linguistic quantifiers are quantifiers defined by linguistic expressions like “around 5” or “most of,” and many types of linguistic quantifiers can be found in the literature (Diaz-Hermida, Bugarin, & Barro, 2003; Glockner, 1997, 2004a, 2004b; Losada, Díaz-Hermida, & Bugarín, 2006) (as semifuzzy quantifiers which allow modeling expressions like “there are twice as many men as women”). We limit this presentation to the original linguistic quantifiers defined by Zadeh (1983) and the two types of quantified statements he proposes. Such linguistic quantifiers allow an intermediate attitude between the conjunction (expressed by the universal quantifier ∀) and the disjunction (expressed by the existential quantifier ∃). Two types of quantified statements can be distinguished. A statement of the first type is denoted “Q X are A” where Q is a linguistic quantifier, X is a crisp set and A is a fuzzy predicate. Such a statement means that “Q elements belonging to X satisfy A.” An example is provided by “most of employees are well-paid” where Q is most of and X is a set AbstrAct","PeriodicalId":118992,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Research on Fuzzy Information Processing in Databases","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Research on Fuzzy Information Processing in Databases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-853-6.CH010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Linguistic quantifiers are quantifiers defined by linguistic expressions like “around 5” or “most of,” and many types of linguistic quantifiers can be found in the literature (Diaz-Hermida, Bugarin, & Barro, 2003; Glockner, 1997, 2004a, 2004b; Losada, Díaz-Hermida, & Bugarín, 2006) (as semifuzzy quantifiers which allow modeling expressions like “there are twice as many men as women”). We limit this presentation to the original linguistic quantifiers defined by Zadeh (1983) and the two types of quantified statements he proposes. Such linguistic quantifiers allow an intermediate attitude between the conjunction (expressed by the universal quantifier ∀) and the disjunction (expressed by the existential quantifier ∃). Two types of quantified statements can be distinguished. A statement of the first type is denoted “Q X are A” where Q is a linguistic quantifier, X is a crisp set and A is a fuzzy predicate. Such a statement means that “Q elements belonging to X satisfy A.” An example is provided by “most of employees are well-paid” where Q is most of and X is a set AbstrAct
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用渐进式数评价量化报表
语言量词是由“大约5”或“大多数”等语言表达定义的量词,在文献中可以找到许多类型的语言量词(Diaz-Hermida, Bugarin, & Barro, 2003;格洛克纳,1997,2004a, 2004b;Losada, Díaz-Hermida, & Bugarín, 2006)(作为半模糊量词,允许建模“男性是女性的两倍”这样的表达式)。我们将此介绍限于Zadeh(1983)定义的原始语言量词和他提出的两种类型的量化陈述。这样的语言量词允许在联结(用全称量词∀表示)和析取(用存在量词∃表示)之间有一种中间态度。可以区分两种类型的量化陈述。第一类语句记为“Q X are A”,其中Q是语言量词,X是清晰集合,A是模糊谓词。这种说法意味着“属于X的Q个元素满足a”,以“大多数雇员都是高薪的”为例,其中Q是most of, X是一个集合AbstrAct
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hierarchical Fuzzy Sets to Query Possibilistic Databases Relational Data, Formal Concept Analysis, and Graded Attributes Evaluation of Quantified Statements Using Gradual Numbers Flexible Querying Techniques Based on CBR A Tool for Fuzzy Reasoning and Querying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1