A. Hinz1, Uta Zweynert2, Jörg Kittel3, Wilmar Igl4, Reinhold Schwarz †5
{"title":"Veränderungsmessung mit der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Änderungssensitivität und Änderungsreliabilität","authors":"A. Hinz1, Uta Zweynert2, Jörg Kittel3, Wilmar Igl4, Reinhold Schwarz †5","doi":"10.1055/s-2008-1067578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"! Responsiveness or sensitivity to change of a questionnaire is an important criterion in the as− sessment of the effect of a medical intervention. In the literature there are several criteria for re− sponsiveness, based on changes in the popula− tion mean. Here we present an alternative ap− proach for the measurement of change (change reliability), applying the criteria of internal con− sistency to change scores. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS, these ap− proaches are demonstrated and compared for 2 subject samples, comprising 901 oncologic pa− tients and 2695 cardiac patients. The effect size d is well suited to assess the effect of an interven− tion, based on changes of the sample mean. The analyses of the 2 samples yielded effect sizes of about 0.25. The newly created change reliability yielded coefficients of about .70 which indicate the reliability of the individual changes in anxie− ty and depression.","PeriodicalId":345802,"journal":{"name":"Psychother Psych Med","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychother Psych Med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1067578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Abstract
! Responsiveness or sensitivity to change of a questionnaire is an important criterion in the as− sessment of the effect of a medical intervention. In the literature there are several criteria for re− sponsiveness, based on changes in the popula− tion mean. Here we present an alternative ap− proach for the measurement of change (change reliability), applying the criteria of internal con− sistency to change scores. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS, these ap− proaches are demonstrated and compared for 2 subject samples, comprising 901 oncologic pa− tients and 2695 cardiac patients. The effect size d is well suited to assess the effect of an interven− tion, based on changes of the sample mean. The analyses of the 2 samples yielded effect sizes of about 0.25. The newly created change reliability yielded coefficients of about .70 which indicate the reliability of the individual changes in anxie− ty and depression.