International law and feminism

A. Wing
{"title":"International law and feminism","authors":"A. Wing","doi":"10.4337/9781786439697.00038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides an overview of the intersection between international law and feminism. It predominantly discusses scholarly writing, but also some major documents and institutions. The US has been notoriously narrow in its understanding of and respect for international law. It is not a required course in most law schools, and American courts often refuse to acknowledge relevant international law at all. This myopia has extended to US feminist legal theory. Many feminist scholars focus on US law in their specialty and never mention the international implications. Some feminist anthologies may not even contain one article on international law.1 Interestingly, collections produced in other countries contain more international material, probably paralleling the acknowledgment of international law within their own legal systems. In the future, it would be significant if US feminists extended their coverage or at least cited more fully to the robust international literature.2 This chapter first shows how feminism has developed within various international law subfields. It then focuses on a major offshoot from traditional international legal jurisprudence known as Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL). Finally, it highlights global critical race feminism (CRF), with its emphasis on women of color, an area that intersects with every area previously reviewed. The conclusion notes that much work remains to be done.","PeriodicalId":275645,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439697.00038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the intersection between international law and feminism. It predominantly discusses scholarly writing, but also some major documents and institutions. The US has been notoriously narrow in its understanding of and respect for international law. It is not a required course in most law schools, and American courts often refuse to acknowledge relevant international law at all. This myopia has extended to US feminist legal theory. Many feminist scholars focus on US law in their specialty and never mention the international implications. Some feminist anthologies may not even contain one article on international law.1 Interestingly, collections produced in other countries contain more international material, probably paralleling the acknowledgment of international law within their own legal systems. In the future, it would be significant if US feminists extended their coverage or at least cited more fully to the robust international literature.2 This chapter first shows how feminism has developed within various international law subfields. It then focuses on a major offshoot from traditional international legal jurisprudence known as Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL). Finally, it highlights global critical race feminism (CRF), with its emphasis on women of color, an area that intersects with every area previously reviewed. The conclusion notes that much work remains to be done.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际法与女权主义
本章概述了国际法与女权主义的交集。它主要讨论学术写作,但也一些主要的文件和机构。众所周知,美国对国际法的理解和尊重过于狭隘。它不是大多数法学院的必修课,而且美国法院经常拒绝承认相关的国际法。这种短视已经延伸到美国女权主义法律理论。许多女权主义学者只关注其专业领域内的美国法律,而对其国际影响只字未提。有些女权主义选集甚至连一篇关于国际法的文章都没有有趣的是,其他国家制作的藏品包含更多的国际材料,可能与他们自己的法律体系中对国际法的承认平行。在未来,如果美国女权主义者扩大他们的覆盖范围,或者至少更充分地引用强大的国际文献,这将是非常重要的本章首先展示了女权主义是如何在国际法的各个子领域中发展起来的。然后,它将重点放在传统国际法理学的一个主要分支,即第三世界国际法方法(TWAIL)。最后,它强调了全球批判性种族女权主义(CRF),其重点是有色人种女性,这一领域与前面讨论的每个领域都有交叉。结论指出,仍有许多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International law and feminism Catharine A. MacKinnon and equality theory Sex equality, gender injury, Title IX and women’s education Sexual harassment law: an evolution in theory, scope and impact A dignitarian feminist jurisprudence with applications to rape, sexual harassment and honor codes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1