R. L. Kæseler, Kasper Leerskov, L. Struijk, K. Dremstrup, M. Jochumsen
{"title":"Designing a brain computer interface for control of an assistive robotic manipulator using steady state visually evoked potentials","authors":"R. L. Kæseler, Kasper Leerskov, L. Struijk, K. Dremstrup, M. Jochumsen","doi":"10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An assistive robotic manipulator (ARM) can provide independence and improve the quality of life for patients suffering from tetraplegia. However, to properly control such device to a satisfactory level without any motor functions requires a very high performing brain-computer interface (BCI). Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) based BCI are among the best performing. Thus, this study investigates the design of a system for a full workspace control of a 7 degrees of freedom ARM. A SSVEP signal is elicited by observing a visual stimulus flickering at a specific frequency and phase. This study investigates the best combination of unique frequencies and phases to provide a 16-target BCI by testing three different systems off line. Furthermore, a fourth system is developed to investigate the impact of the stimulating monitor refresh rate. Experiments conducted on two subjects suggest that a 16-target BCI created by four unique frequencies and 16-unique phases provide the best performance. Subject 1 reaches a maximum estimated ITR of 235 bits/min while subject 2 reaches 140 bits/min. The findings suggest that the optimal SSVEP stimuli to generate 16 targets are a low number of frequencies and a high number of unique phases. Moreover, the findings do not suggest any need for considering the monitor refresh rate if stimuli are modulated using a sinusoidal signal sampled at the refresh rate.","PeriodicalId":130415,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
An assistive robotic manipulator (ARM) can provide independence and improve the quality of life for patients suffering from tetraplegia. However, to properly control such device to a satisfactory level without any motor functions requires a very high performing brain-computer interface (BCI). Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) based BCI are among the best performing. Thus, this study investigates the design of a system for a full workspace control of a 7 degrees of freedom ARM. A SSVEP signal is elicited by observing a visual stimulus flickering at a specific frequency and phase. This study investigates the best combination of unique frequencies and phases to provide a 16-target BCI by testing three different systems off line. Furthermore, a fourth system is developed to investigate the impact of the stimulating monitor refresh rate. Experiments conducted on two subjects suggest that a 16-target BCI created by four unique frequencies and 16-unique phases provide the best performance. Subject 1 reaches a maximum estimated ITR of 235 bits/min while subject 2 reaches 140 bits/min. The findings suggest that the optimal SSVEP stimuli to generate 16 targets are a low number of frequencies and a high number of unique phases. Moreover, the findings do not suggest any need for considering the monitor refresh rate if stimuli are modulated using a sinusoidal signal sampled at the refresh rate.