COT - customer owned trouble

Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451) Pub Date : 2003-06-02 DOI:10.1145/775832.775858

R. Dahlberg, S. Rawat, J. Bernier, G. Gloski, Aurangzeb Khan, K. Patel, P. Ruddy, N. Sherwani, R. Vasishta

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Increasingly, system houses are attracted to the customer-owned tooling (COT) model to gain more control of their schedules and costs. COT project risk and cost are high, often seeming more like customer owned "trouble," so the design team needs to be expertly prepared. The pathways to implement a COT design include (a) Manage the sourcing (internal or third party resources) of individual supply chain and cost reduction functions; (b) Use an integrated design-to-parts service; or (c) A hybrid of these two extremes. This panel will consider the pros and cons for each approach.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

客户自有的麻烦

越来越多的系统公司被客户拥有的工具(COT)模型所吸引，以获得对其时间表和成本的更多控制。COT项目的风险和成本很高，通常看起来更像是客户自己的“麻烦”，因此设计团队需要熟练地做好准备。实施COT设计的途径包括(a)管理单个供应链的采购(内部或第三方资源)和降低成本的功能;(b)采用从设计到零件的综合服务;(c)这两种极端的混合。本小组将考虑每种方法的优缺点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

SAT-based unbounded symbolic model checking Self-biased high-bandwidth low-jitter 1-to-4096 multiplier clock generator PLL Design techniques for sensor appliances: foundations and light compass case study Hybrid hierarchical timing closure methodology for a high performance and low power DSP Low-power design methodology for an on-chip with adaptive bandwidth capability