Is CoI framework a sign of deep and meaning learning outcomes?

Carla M. A. Pinto, L. Babo, Jorge Mendonça
{"title":"Is CoI framework a sign of deep and meaning learning outcomes?","authors":"Carla M. A. Pinto, L. Babo, Jorge Mendonça","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The community of inquiry (CoI) framework has been developed to achieve optimal design of online learning environments, to reinforce critical thinking, critical inquiry, and discourse among students and teachers [1]. Social, teaching, and cognitive presences are defined as vital pieces to promote successful educational experiences. In the literature, one can find a large set of papers related to the CoI framework. Some of these support CoI and some try to establish the lack of empirical evidence to support the CoI main plea, which is learners’ deep and meaningful learning outcomes, through strengthening of their cognitive, teaching, and social presences.The present study was conducted in a hybrid course of Mathematics. Students’ responses to the CoI survey were related with learning achievement measures. There were three types of measures: teamwork, individual work, and individual exam’s grades. Results from statistical analysis show that the teamwork grade was associated with the social presence. No other correlations were found between any of the learning achievement measures and the CoI environment.","PeriodicalId":416694,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The community of inquiry (CoI) framework has been developed to achieve optimal design of online learning environments, to reinforce critical thinking, critical inquiry, and discourse among students and teachers [1]. Social, teaching, and cognitive presences are defined as vital pieces to promote successful educational experiences. In the literature, one can find a large set of papers related to the CoI framework. Some of these support CoI and some try to establish the lack of empirical evidence to support the CoI main plea, which is learners’ deep and meaningful learning outcomes, through strengthening of their cognitive, teaching, and social presences.The present study was conducted in a hybrid course of Mathematics. Students’ responses to the CoI survey were related with learning achievement measures. There were three types of measures: teamwork, individual work, and individual exam’s grades. Results from statistical analysis show that the teamwork grade was associated with the social presence. No other correlations were found between any of the learning achievement measures and the CoI environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CoI框架是深度和有意义的学习成果的标志吗?
探究社区(CoI)框架的开发是为了实现在线学习环境的优化设计,以加强学生和教师之间的批判性思维、批判性探究和话语[1]。社会、教学和认知存在被定义为促进成功教育经验的重要组成部分。在文献中,人们可以找到大量与CoI框架相关的论文。其中一些支持CoI,而另一些则试图证明缺乏经验证据来支持CoI的主要诉求,即通过加强学习者的认知、教学和社会存在来获得深刻而有意义的学习成果。本研究在一门数学混合课程中进行。学生对CoI调查的反应与学习成就测量有关。有三种测量方法:团队合作、个人作业和个人考试成绩。统计分析结果表明,团队合作成绩与社会存在存在显著的相关关系。没有发现任何学习成就测量与CoI环境之间的其他相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual Laboratory Workshop in Physics Hands-on Physics Experiments for K-6 Teachers at CERN Analysis of dual and non-dual student learning outcomes and student dropout data A Proposed Machine Learning Based Approach to Support Students with Learning Difficulties in The Post-Pandemic Norm Fab Lab-based learning: an environment to promote Women and Leadership in Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1