Unit Costs and Income From Selected Products in 2017 – Research Results in the Agrokoszty System

A. Skarżyńska
{"title":"Unit Costs and Income From Selected Products in 2017 – Research Results in the Agrokoszty System","authors":"A. Skarżyńska","doi":"10.30858/ZER/109928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2013, the research covered: winter wheat, winter rye, spring barley, winter rape and live pigs. Results of activities were analysed at farms running small-, medium- and large-scale production. Although the production volume, recognised as small, medium and large, is of relative nature, the research results provide a premise for the selection of production scale able to ensure a fairly high production efficiency. Analysis in groups of farms, selected according to production scale, showed that production profitability (ratio of production value to direct costs and overheads in total) at large scale was always higher than at small scale. The advantage of large scale was: for winter wheat – 6.4 pp, winter rye – 3.6 pp, spring barley – 6.9 pp, winter rape – 11.3 pp, and live pigs – 16.7 pp. The positive effect of scale impact on economic results is evident. Above all, labour-intensity of production dropped along with an increase in scale, which had a positive impact on the level of income per 1 hour of own labour and, consequently, its degree of coverage. In case of crop production activity, farmer’s labour inputs were covered in all scale ranges, but at significantly higher level at large and medium scale than at small scale. In 2013, production of live pigs in most of the farms from the research sample was unprofitable, which means that revenues failed to fully cover the production costs. However, in each group there were farms where live pigs were profitable, the highest share of such farms was noted at large scale of pigs for fattening – 47%, against 17% at medium scale and 9% at small scale of production.","PeriodicalId":111133,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Agricultural Economics (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Agricultural Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30858/ZER/109928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In 2013, the research covered: winter wheat, winter rye, spring barley, winter rape and live pigs. Results of activities were analysed at farms running small-, medium- and large-scale production. Although the production volume, recognised as small, medium and large, is of relative nature, the research results provide a premise for the selection of production scale able to ensure a fairly high production efficiency. Analysis in groups of farms, selected according to production scale, showed that production profitability (ratio of production value to direct costs and overheads in total) at large scale was always higher than at small scale. The advantage of large scale was: for winter wheat – 6.4 pp, winter rye – 3.6 pp, spring barley – 6.9 pp, winter rape – 11.3 pp, and live pigs – 16.7 pp. The positive effect of scale impact on economic results is evident. Above all, labour-intensity of production dropped along with an increase in scale, which had a positive impact on the level of income per 1 hour of own labour and, consequently, its degree of coverage. In case of crop production activity, farmer’s labour inputs were covered in all scale ranges, but at significantly higher level at large and medium scale than at small scale. In 2013, production of live pigs in most of the farms from the research sample was unprofitable, which means that revenues failed to fully cover the production costs. However, in each group there were farms where live pigs were profitable, the highest share of such farms was noted at large scale of pigs for fattening – 47%, against 17% at medium scale and 9% at small scale of production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017年选定产品的单位成本和收入——Agrokoszty系统的研究成果
2013年的研究包括:冬小麦、冬黑麦、春大麦、冬油菜和生猪。对小型、中型和大规模生产农场的活动结果进行了分析。虽然生产规模分为小、中、大,是相对的,但研究结果为选择能够保证较高生产效率的生产规模提供了前提。根据生产规模选择的农场群分析表明,大规模的生产盈利能力(产值与直接成本和总管理费用之比)总是高于小规模。规模优势为冬小麦6.4 pp、冬黑麦3.6 pp、春大麦6.9 pp、冬油菜11.3 pp、生猪16.7 pp。规模效应对经济效益的积极影响是明显的。最重要的是,生产的劳动强度随着规模的增加而下降,这对每小时自己劳动的收入水平产生了积极的影响,从而对其覆盖的程度产生了积极的影响。就作物生产活动而言,农民的劳动投入包括在所有规模范围内,但在大、中规模的水平明显高于小规模。2013年,研究样本中大多数农场的生猪生产都不盈利,这意味着收入无法完全覆盖生产成本。然而,在每组中都有生猪盈利的农场,这类农场中用于育肥的猪所占比例最高,为47%,中等规模为17%,小规模为9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Price Transmission in Cotton Futures Market: Evidence from Three Countries Estimating Multinomial Choice Models with Unobserved Choice Sets Measurement of collusion in open ascending price auctions in agricultural commodity markets A Model of Collusion Formation and Measurement in the Open Ascending Bid Auctions in Agricultural Commodity Markets The Future of the Rural Economy in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1