The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: A German Perspective

Bernd Schüünemann
{"title":"The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: A German Perspective","authors":"Bernd Schüünemann","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.2004.8.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Within Europe, the traditional concept of crime being flawed, individual conduct dominated. The concept of deterrence, achieved through the threat of punishment, and the related concept of personal culpability, made the representatives of a corporate entity in which a crime had been committed criminally liable insofar as they either participated in the causal act through their own doing or did not prevent it even though their position within the entity meant that they had a duty to act. Hence, in many cases in which an act of the representative could not be proved, the crime of omission became the most important instrument of criminal justice. In particular the principals","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2004.8.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

1. Within Europe, the traditional concept of crime being flawed, individual conduct dominated. The concept of deterrence, achieved through the threat of punishment, and the related concept of personal culpability, made the representatives of a corporate entity in which a crime had been committed criminally liable insofar as they either participated in the causal act through their own doing or did not prevent it even though their position within the entity meant that they had a duty to act. Hence, in many cases in which an act of the representative could not be proved, the crime of omission became the most important instrument of criminal justice. In particular the principals
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2002年萨班斯-奥克斯利法案:德国视角
1. 在欧洲,传统的犯罪观念有缺陷,个人行为占主导地位。通过惩罚威胁实现的威慑概念和有关的个人罪责概念,使犯罪发生的公司实体的代表负有刑事责任,因为他们要么通过自己的行为参与了因果行为,要么没有阻止这种行为,尽管他们在该实体中的地位意味着他们有责任采取行动。因此,在许多不能证明代表的行为的案件中,不作为罪成为刑事司法的最重要手段。特别是校长
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Murder After the Merger: A Commentary on Finkelstein Group Violence and Group Vengeance: Toward a Retributivist Theory of International Criminal Law Benthamite Reflections on Codification of the General Principles of Criminal Liability: Towards the Panopticon The Politics of Grace: On the Moral Justification of Executive Clemency Toward a Better Categorical Balance of the Costs and Benefits of the Exclusionary Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1