{"title":"Seizing the “Point Imaginary”","authors":"W. Hyman","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198837510.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Seizing the ‘Point Imaginary’ ” follows erotic poets as they grapple with the elusive concept of nothingness. The pervasive quips about a woman’s “nothing” within Renaissance literature belie the fact that virginity is in several respects a genuine paradox. Although countless attempts upon the “point imaginary” were merely sexual in nature, others make of the hymen the ultimate sign of mystery and impossibility: a tympan between materiality and immateriality, the cusp between the known and unknown. The hymen, like the Lucretian atom or the draftsman’s mathematical horizon of sight, sometimes functions as the poet’s conceptual limit point. Worth pursuing for its own sake, this vanishing point of the female body further beckons the poet with the tantalizing threshold of knowledge that it emblematizes. A seemingly trivial seduction narrative such as Christopher Marlowe’s Hero and Leander thereby re-emerges as a site for wrestling with the epistemological and ontological problems that this paradoxical bit of material represents. This chapter traces these operations in the works of several authors, including Shakespeare, Richard Crashaw, Abraham Cowley, Ben Jonson, John Davies, and Thomas Wyatt. “Nothing,” for these poets, may initially refer to the woman and her questionable virginity, but also becomes attached to more portentous unknowables and supersigns. Such “impossible” thoughts were not wholly containable within the airy realm of paradox. They had implications for how early moderns understood the limits of knowledge in relation to both bodily and poetic form.","PeriodicalId":216050,"journal":{"name":"Impossible Desire and the Limits of Knowledge in Renaissance Poetry","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Impossible Desire and the Limits of Knowledge in Renaissance Poetry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198837510.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Seizing the ‘Point Imaginary’ ” follows erotic poets as they grapple with the elusive concept of nothingness. The pervasive quips about a woman’s “nothing” within Renaissance literature belie the fact that virginity is in several respects a genuine paradox. Although countless attempts upon the “point imaginary” were merely sexual in nature, others make of the hymen the ultimate sign of mystery and impossibility: a tympan between materiality and immateriality, the cusp between the known and unknown. The hymen, like the Lucretian atom or the draftsman’s mathematical horizon of sight, sometimes functions as the poet’s conceptual limit point. Worth pursuing for its own sake, this vanishing point of the female body further beckons the poet with the tantalizing threshold of knowledge that it emblematizes. A seemingly trivial seduction narrative such as Christopher Marlowe’s Hero and Leander thereby re-emerges as a site for wrestling with the epistemological and ontological problems that this paradoxical bit of material represents. This chapter traces these operations in the works of several authors, including Shakespeare, Richard Crashaw, Abraham Cowley, Ben Jonson, John Davies, and Thomas Wyatt. “Nothing,” for these poets, may initially refer to the woman and her questionable virginity, but also becomes attached to more portentous unknowables and supersigns. Such “impossible” thoughts were not wholly containable within the airy realm of paradox. They had implications for how early moderns understood the limits of knowledge in relation to both bodily and poetic form.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抓住“虚点”
“抓住‘想象点’”跟随情色诗人与虚无这个难以捉摸的概念作斗争。文艺复兴文学中普遍存在的关于女性“一无所有”的讽刺,掩盖了一个事实,即贞操在某些方面是一个真正的悖论。虽然无数对“想象点”的尝试在本质上仅仅是性的,但其他人把处女膜变成了神秘和不可能的终极标志:物质和非物质之间的鼓室,已知和未知之间的尖端。处女膜,就像卢克莱tian的原子或绘图员的数学视野一样,有时是诗人概念上的极限点。女性身体的这个消失点值得追求,它象征着知识的诱人门槛,进一步召唤着诗人。一个看似微不足道的诱惑叙事,比如克里斯托弗·马洛的《英雄与利安德》,因此重新出现,成为一个与这种矛盾的材料所代表的认识论和本体论问题进行角力的场所。本章追溯了几位作家作品中的这些操作,包括莎士比亚、理查德·克拉肖、亚伯拉罕·考利、本·琼森、约翰·戴维斯和托马斯·怀亚特。对这些诗人来说,“什么都没有”最初可能指的是这个女人和她可疑的童贞,但也与更不祥的不可知和超符号联系在一起。这种“不可能”的想法并不能完全包含在虚幻的悖论中。它们暗示了早期现代人如何理解与身体和诗歌形式有关的知识的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seizing the “Point Imaginary” Telling Time on the Body Saying No and Saying Yes The Erotics of Doubt Poetry and Matter in the English Renaissance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1