Proletkult Diplomacy. What About Romania in the Last Minutes of Tsardom1 and the First of People’s Republic of Bulgaria (1945-1947) Foreign Affairs

Florin Anghel
{"title":"Proletkult Diplomacy. What About Romania in the Last Minutes of Tsardom1 and the First of People’s Republic of Bulgaria (1945-1947) Foreign Affairs","authors":"Florin Anghel","doi":"10.2478/amsh-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Romanian-Bulgarian relations were assigned the role of satellites belonging first to the Axis, and then to U.S.S.R., following the regulation of the territorial statute of South Dobrudja on September 7th 1940, through the Treaty from Craiova. After the Red Army has entered Bulgaria, on September 8th 1944, an unusual fact has intervened between Bucharest and Sofia, from the perspective of Kremlin’s influence, of course: the priority of Bulgarian political, ideological and diplomatic factors over the Romanian ones, unprecedented fact in the history of almost seven decades of the modern bilateral relations. The lack of human and ideological resources of the Romanian Communist Party has become obvious during the not even declared competition with the Bulgarian Communists and their leader, Georgi Dimitrov. The Communist Bulgaria has become a model that Romanian communists do not only seriously took into account, yet, at least the year King Mihai I has abdicated (1947), they zestfully were also studying and copying, as the case may have been. Being a so-called People’s Republic even since September 1946, following a falsified popular referendum, Bulgaria has undertaken during the next months to coordinate plans of internal and external politics of Romania. In order to finalize a “Bulgarian way” in Romania, the government led by Petru Groza and the media of propaganda, and mainly the press official of the Romanian Communist Party, “Scânteia”, have scrupulously assumed the role of protagonists. And Communist Bulgaria, just like U.S.S.R., has become for more than two years (1946- February 1948) an extremely important and valuable topic of the Romanian public speech, of the Romanian Communists’ confirmation, of establishing the project for instituting the totalitarian regime. The similarity of actions and of institutes’ organization is striking for this short period, and the treaty signed in January 1948 is nothing but the final of a stage extremely abundant in models and suggestions for the Romanian communists.","PeriodicalId":206123,"journal":{"name":"Acta Marisiensis. Seria Historia","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Marisiensis. Seria Historia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amsh-2021-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Romanian-Bulgarian relations were assigned the role of satellites belonging first to the Axis, and then to U.S.S.R., following the regulation of the territorial statute of South Dobrudja on September 7th 1940, through the Treaty from Craiova. After the Red Army has entered Bulgaria, on September 8th 1944, an unusual fact has intervened between Bucharest and Sofia, from the perspective of Kremlin’s influence, of course: the priority of Bulgarian political, ideological and diplomatic factors over the Romanian ones, unprecedented fact in the history of almost seven decades of the modern bilateral relations. The lack of human and ideological resources of the Romanian Communist Party has become obvious during the not even declared competition with the Bulgarian Communists and their leader, Georgi Dimitrov. The Communist Bulgaria has become a model that Romanian communists do not only seriously took into account, yet, at least the year King Mihai I has abdicated (1947), they zestfully were also studying and copying, as the case may have been. Being a so-called People’s Republic even since September 1946, following a falsified popular referendum, Bulgaria has undertaken during the next months to coordinate plans of internal and external politics of Romania. In order to finalize a “Bulgarian way” in Romania, the government led by Petru Groza and the media of propaganda, and mainly the press official of the Romanian Communist Party, “Scânteia”, have scrupulously assumed the role of protagonists. And Communist Bulgaria, just like U.S.S.R., has become for more than two years (1946- February 1948) an extremely important and valuable topic of the Romanian public speech, of the Romanian Communists’ confirmation, of establishing the project for instituting the totalitarian regime. The similarity of actions and of institutes’ organization is striking for this short period, and the treaty signed in January 1948 is nothing but the final of a stage extremely abundant in models and suggestions for the Romanian communists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proletkult外交。沙皇最后时刻的罗马尼亚和保加利亚人民共和国第一时期(1945-1947)外交
1944年9月8日,苏联红军进入保加利亚后,一个不寻常的事实介入了布加勒斯特和索非亚之间的关系,当然是从克里姆林宫影响的角度来看:保加利亚的政治、意识形态和外交因素优先于罗马尼亚的因素,这在近七十年的现代双边关系历史上是前所未有的。在与保加利亚共产党及其领导人格奥尔基·迪米特洛夫(Georgi Dimitrov)甚至没有公开的竞争中,罗马尼亚共产党的人力和思想资源的缺乏已经变得显而易见。共产主义的保加利亚已经成为罗马尼亚共产党人不仅认真考虑的榜样,而且,至少在米哈伊一世退位的那一年(1947年),他们也在热情地学习和模仿,就像情况一样。保加利亚自1946年9月以来即是所谓的人民共和国,在一次伪造的全民投票之后,在今后几个月里,保加利亚已着手协调罗马尼亚的内部和外部政治计划。为了在罗马尼亚最终确定“保加利亚方式”,由Petru Groza领导的政府和宣传媒体,主要是罗马尼亚共产党的新闻官员“scanteia”,小心翼翼地扮演了主角的角色。共产主义的保加利亚,就像苏联一样,在两年多的时间里(1946年至1948年2月),已经成为罗马尼亚公众演讲的一个极其重要和有价值的话题,罗马尼亚共产党人确认,建立极权主义政权的计划。在这么短的时间内,行动和机构组织的相似性是惊人的,1948年1月签署的条约只不过是罗马尼亚共产党人的榜样和建议极其丰富的阶段的最后阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Short-Lived Newspaper from TG. Mureș, The Erdélyi Társaság (1921-1922) Aspects Concerning the Battle of Baia (1467) and the Wound of King Matthias Corvin. On the Controversy in the Chronicles of the Times and on a Less Known Surgical Intervention Religious Affiliation as a Political Site of Contestation? Polemical Voices of a New Generation of Romanian Romani Authors* Book Review: Dansul Natașei. O istorie culturalӑ a Rusiei Book Review: Femeia între tradiția și modernitatea românească (a doua jumătate a secolului al XIX-lea și începuturile secolului XX). Interogații, realizări, perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1