Access to Social Services in India: Findings from a Social Equality Index (SEI)

D. Mohan, R. Sekhani, Serene Vaid
{"title":"Access to Social Services in India: Findings from a Social Equality Index (SEI)","authors":"D. Mohan, R. Sekhani, Serene Vaid","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3231696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being one of the fastest growing economies in the world in recent years, the average Indian remains relatively poor due to a highly-skewed income distribution and inequitable access to basic social and economic services. The poorer half jostles for less than 4.1% of national wealth while relational inequities continue to rise across states. This gap of more than four times between the richest and the poorest state in India is seen to be responsible for one of the highest level of disparity in the developing world, subsequently affecting delivery mechanisms and access to basic social services such as basic education, healthcare, credit institutions, law enforcement justice mechanisms and other basic amenities (drinking water and sanitation). \nThis study provides an in-depth assessment of each Indian State’s performance in ensuring access to basic social and economic services (including access to basic health care, education, credit or financial services, water and sanitation facilities and access to justice-law enforcing institutions) to its citizens. The objective of this in-depth data analysis is to initiate policy level discussions on minimizing levels of unequal opportunities for citizens residing across identified states of the country. \nWe theoretically use a Mini-Max approach (inverse to the Maxi-Min utilitarian principle) in understanding the relative dimensions of social and economic inequality present across states in India. The objective of using such a concept is to promote minimum access to some identified social and economic services that enable people (across states) to develop capabilities which are instrumental towards the maximization of their well-being over a period of time. The five fundamental pillars constituting as basic services to be safeguarded and provided by agencies of the state include: \na) Access to Basic Amenities (Drinking water and sanitation facilities) b) Access to Education c) Access to Basic Healthcare services d) Access to Credit and Financial service e) Access to Justice (Public Institutions of law enforcement). \nIn terms of methodology, we use a principle component analysis for deriving the index values for each pillar. The states based on index value have been classified as leaders, above average performing states, average performing states, below average performing states and least performing states. The classification acts as a scorecard for the persistence of access inequality in the Indian states and will draw the attention of policymakers towards states that lag behind in the implementation of the various policies and reforms. Such a method of ranking also enables states to identify their counterparts who have successfully ensured greater progress in terms of providing basic social and economic services at nearer proximity and as per the state population needs.","PeriodicalId":347116,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Social Welfare Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3231696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being one of the fastest growing economies in the world in recent years, the average Indian remains relatively poor due to a highly-skewed income distribution and inequitable access to basic social and economic services. The poorer half jostles for less than 4.1% of national wealth while relational inequities continue to rise across states. This gap of more than four times between the richest and the poorest state in India is seen to be responsible for one of the highest level of disparity in the developing world, subsequently affecting delivery mechanisms and access to basic social services such as basic education, healthcare, credit institutions, law enforcement justice mechanisms and other basic amenities (drinking water and sanitation). This study provides an in-depth assessment of each Indian State’s performance in ensuring access to basic social and economic services (including access to basic health care, education, credit or financial services, water and sanitation facilities and access to justice-law enforcing institutions) to its citizens. The objective of this in-depth data analysis is to initiate policy level discussions on minimizing levels of unequal opportunities for citizens residing across identified states of the country. We theoretically use a Mini-Max approach (inverse to the Maxi-Min utilitarian principle) in understanding the relative dimensions of social and economic inequality present across states in India. The objective of using such a concept is to promote minimum access to some identified social and economic services that enable people (across states) to develop capabilities which are instrumental towards the maximization of their well-being over a period of time. The five fundamental pillars constituting as basic services to be safeguarded and provided by agencies of the state include: a) Access to Basic Amenities (Drinking water and sanitation facilities) b) Access to Education c) Access to Basic Healthcare services d) Access to Credit and Financial service e) Access to Justice (Public Institutions of law enforcement). In terms of methodology, we use a principle component analysis for deriving the index values for each pillar. The states based on index value have been classified as leaders, above average performing states, average performing states, below average performing states and least performing states. The classification acts as a scorecard for the persistence of access inequality in the Indian states and will draw the attention of policymakers towards states that lag behind in the implementation of the various policies and reforms. Such a method of ranking also enables states to identify their counterparts who have successfully ensured greater progress in terms of providing basic social and economic services at nearer proximity and as per the state population needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度社会服务的获取:来自社会平等指数(SEI)的调查结果
尽管印度是近年来世界上增长最快的经济体之一,但由于收入分配严重失衡,以及获得基本社会和经济服务的机会不公平,印度的平均水平仍然相对较低。较贫穷的一半人争夺不到全国财富的4.1%,而各州之间的关系不平等继续加剧。印度最富邦和最穷邦之间的差距超过四倍,这被认为是造成发展中世界差距最大的原因之一,从而影响到基本社会服务的提供机制和获得机会,如基础教育、医疗保健、信贷机构、执法司法机制和其他基本便利设施(饮用水和卫生设施)。本研究深入评估了印度各邦在确保其公民获得基本社会和经济服务(包括获得基本保健、教育、信贷或金融服务、水和卫生设施以及利用司法-执法机构)方面的表现。这项深入数据分析的目的是启动政策层面的讨论,以最大限度地减少居住在该国确定州的公民的不平等机会。从理论上讲,我们使用Mini-Max方法(与max - min功利主义原则相反)来理解印度各州存在的社会和经济不平等的相对维度。使用这一概念的目的是促进最低限度地获得某些已确定的社会和经济服务,使人们(跨州)能够发展有助于在一段时间内实现其福祉最大化的能力。构成由国家机构保障和提供的基本服务的五个基本支柱包括:a)获得基本便利设施(饮用水和卫生设施)b)获得教育c)获得基本保健服务d)获得信贷和金融服务e)获得司法救助(公共执法机构)。在方法方面,我们使用主成分分析来推导每个支柱的指数值。根据指数值,这些州被划分为领先州、高于平均水平的州、平均水平以下的州和最差的州。该分类作为印度各邦持续存在的准入不平等的记分卡,将引起政策制定者对在实施各种政策和改革方面落后的各邦的关注。这种排名方法还使各州能够确定哪些国家成功地确保了在就近提供基本社会和经济服务方面取得更大进展,并符合各州人口的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Electoral Consequences of Indebtedness under Austerity Other People’s Money: Preferences for Equality in Groups Labor Market Screening and Social Insurance Program Design for the Disabled Temporary Stays and Persistent Gains: The Causal Effects of Foster Care Social Enterprises and Welfare Systems. The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Price Discrimination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1