Conflict of interests among shareholders – does it refer to dividend decisions?

E. Bukalska, Myroslava Zabediuk, N. Mostovenko
{"title":"Conflict of interests among shareholders – does it refer to dividend decisions?","authors":"E. Bukalska, Myroslava Zabediuk, N. Mostovenko","doi":"10.2478/foli-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research background Agency theory refers to the conflict of interests between different groups involved in the business. One aspect of the agency theory is conflict among shareholders. One of the areas of potential conflict is dividend payment. Purpose The goal of our paper was to identify the impact of voting behaviour of shareholders during Annual General Meetings on dividend decisions. We make a comparison between big and small companies. Research methodology We included the 20 biggest and the 20 smallest companies from the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE) in our sample over the 2010–2022 period. We collected 413 observations (shareholders’ presence, voting results from annual general meetings, and financial data). We use statistical tests, a correlation analysis, and a regression analysis. Results: We found that in small companies there is conflict among large shareholders on dividend payout decisions, while in big companies small shareholders show their disappointment by voting against or abstaining from voting for financial statement acceptance (but not dividend payout decisions). Additionally, we found that the higher presence of large shareholders at the AGM the lower the dividend payout is. Novelty: The originality of the paper is that instead of ownership structure we took into account shareholders’ presence at AGM’s. We deal with a unique set of hand-collected data on voting results. We present new evidence on interests of conflict among shareholders (not only on dividend decisions). Although the problem of the conflict between minority and majority shareholders was identified, there is a scarcity of research on its background and implication.","PeriodicalId":314664,"journal":{"name":"Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research background Agency theory refers to the conflict of interests between different groups involved in the business. One aspect of the agency theory is conflict among shareholders. One of the areas of potential conflict is dividend payment. Purpose The goal of our paper was to identify the impact of voting behaviour of shareholders during Annual General Meetings on dividend decisions. We make a comparison between big and small companies. Research methodology We included the 20 biggest and the 20 smallest companies from the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE) in our sample over the 2010–2022 period. We collected 413 observations (shareholders’ presence, voting results from annual general meetings, and financial data). We use statistical tests, a correlation analysis, and a regression analysis. Results: We found that in small companies there is conflict among large shareholders on dividend payout decisions, while in big companies small shareholders show their disappointment by voting against or abstaining from voting for financial statement acceptance (but not dividend payout decisions). Additionally, we found that the higher presence of large shareholders at the AGM the lower the dividend payout is. Novelty: The originality of the paper is that instead of ownership structure we took into account shareholders’ presence at AGM’s. We deal with a unique set of hand-collected data on voting results. We present new evidence on interests of conflict among shareholders (not only on dividend decisions). Although the problem of the conflict between minority and majority shareholders was identified, there is a scarcity of research on its background and implication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股东之间的利益冲突——是指股利决定吗?
摘要研究背景代理理论是指企业中不同参与群体之间的利益冲突。代理理论的一个方面是股东之间的冲突。潜在冲突的领域之一是股息支付。本文的目的是确定年度股东大会期间股东投票行为对股息决策的影响。我们对大公司和小公司进行比较。我们在2010-2022年期间将华沙证券交易所(WSE)的20家最大和20家最小的公司纳入我们的样本。我们收集了413项观察结果(股东出席、年度股东大会投票结果和财务数据)。我们使用统计检验、相关分析和回归分析。结果:我们发现,在小公司中,大股东在股息支付决策上存在冲突,而在大公司中,小股东通过投票反对或弃权财务报表接受(但不是股息支付决策)来表达他们的失望。此外,我们发现,大股东出席年度股东大会的人数越多,股息支付就越低。新颖性:本文的独创性在于,我们没有考虑所有权结构,而是考虑了股东在年度股东大会上的出席情况。我们处理一组独特的手工收集的投票结果数据。我们提出了股东之间利益冲突的新证据(不仅仅是股息决策)。虽然中小股东与大股东之间的冲突问题已经被发现,但对其背景和含义的研究却很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Land Resources and Agricultural Exports Nexus Conflict of interests among shareholders – does it refer to dividend decisions? An Attempt to Measure and Model Women’s Attitudes to Saving for Retirement Reliability of Renewable Power Generation using the Example of Offshore Wind Farms Balance of Payments as a Monetary Phenomenon: An ARDL Bounds Test Method for Algeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1