Comparing Tax Incentives across Jurisdictions: A Pilot Study

M. Meinzer, Mustapha Ndajiwo, Rachel Etter-Phoya, M. Diakite
{"title":"Comparing Tax Incentives across Jurisdictions: A Pilot Study","authors":"M. Meinzer, Mustapha Ndajiwo, Rachel Etter-Phoya, M. Diakite","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3483437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research suggests that profit based tax incentives are costly, tend to fail in attracting additional desirable foreign direct investment, and are problematic especially when they are temporary (e.g. tax holidays), geographically confined (e.g. economic zones) and when they provide full tax exemption/nil taxation (vs. tax reduction concession). Yet, there is no publicly available dataset that would allow systematic panel analyses across jurisdictions of these phenomena. This research gap limits the validity and reliability of existing research findings, and constrains future research into the relative effects and costs of tax incentives. Therefore, we analyse 15 countries, testing data availability, comparability and potential criteria for establishing an assessment matrix for a public cross-country dataset of profit based tax incentives. Preliminary findings suggest that when compared, high income countries tend to offer more cost based incentives, while middle and low income countries most often rely on special economic zones and tax holidays.","PeriodicalId":431495,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Taxation","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Recent research suggests that profit based tax incentives are costly, tend to fail in attracting additional desirable foreign direct investment, and are problematic especially when they are temporary (e.g. tax holidays), geographically confined (e.g. economic zones) and when they provide full tax exemption/nil taxation (vs. tax reduction concession). Yet, there is no publicly available dataset that would allow systematic panel analyses across jurisdictions of these phenomena. This research gap limits the validity and reliability of existing research findings, and constrains future research into the relative effects and costs of tax incentives. Therefore, we analyse 15 countries, testing data availability, comparability and potential criteria for establishing an assessment matrix for a public cross-country dataset of profit based tax incentives. Preliminary findings suggest that when compared, high income countries tend to offer more cost based incentives, while middle and low income countries most often rely on special economic zones and tax holidays.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较不同司法管辖区的税收优惠:一项试点研究
最近的研究表明,以利润为基础的税收激励措施成本高昂,往往无法吸引更多理想的外国直接投资,而且当它们是暂时的(如免税期)、地理上受限制的(如经济区)和提供完全免税/零税收(相对于减税优惠)时尤其存在问题。然而,目前还没有公开可用的数据集,可以对这些现象进行跨司法管辖区的系统小组分析。这一研究缺口限制了现有研究成果的效度和信度,也制约了未来对税收优惠相对效果和成本的研究。因此,我们分析了15个国家,测试了数据的可用性、可比性和潜在标准,以便为基于利润的税收激励的公共跨国数据集建立评估矩阵。初步调查结果表明,相比之下,高收入国家倾向于提供更多基于成本的激励措施,而中低收入国家通常依赖经济特区和免税期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Gini Index Weights Income by the Proportion of People Receiving More Comment on International Tax Reform Framework Discussion Draft by Senate Committee on Finance Chair Ron Wyden and Senators Sherrod Brown and Mark Warner The VAT under Excess Capacity: The Case of Ethiopia VAT Refunds in Developing Countries The Failure of Opportunity Zones in Oregon: Lifeless Place-Based Economic Development Implementation through a Policy Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1