Towards a writing analytics framework for adult english language learners

Amna Liaqat, Cosmin Munteanu
{"title":"Towards a writing analytics framework for adult english language learners","authors":"Amna Liaqat, Cosmin Munteanu","doi":"10.1145/3170358.3170422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving the written literacy of newcomers to English-speaking countries can lead to better education, employment, or social integration opportunities. However, this remains a challenge in traditional classrooms where providing frequent, timely, and personalized feedback is not always possible. Analytics can scaffold the writing development of English Language Learners (ELLs) by providing such feedback. To design these analytics, we conducted a field study analyzing essay samples from immigrant adult ELLs (a group often overlooked in writing analytics research) and identifying their epistemic beliefs and learning motivations. We identified common themes across individual learner differences and patterns of errors in the writing samples. The study revealed strong associations between epistemic writing beliefs and learning strategies. The results are used to develop guidelines for designing writing analytics for adult ELLs, and to propose ideas for analytics that scaffold writing development for this group.","PeriodicalId":437369,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","volume":"3 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Improving the written literacy of newcomers to English-speaking countries can lead to better education, employment, or social integration opportunities. However, this remains a challenge in traditional classrooms where providing frequent, timely, and personalized feedback is not always possible. Analytics can scaffold the writing development of English Language Learners (ELLs) by providing such feedback. To design these analytics, we conducted a field study analyzing essay samples from immigrant adult ELLs (a group often overlooked in writing analytics research) and identifying their epistemic beliefs and learning motivations. We identified common themes across individual learner differences and patterns of errors in the writing samples. The study revealed strong associations between epistemic writing beliefs and learning strategies. The results are used to develop guidelines for designing writing analytics for adult ELLs, and to propose ideas for analytics that scaffold writing development for this group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向成人英语学习者的写作分析框架
提高英语国家新移民的书写能力可以带来更好的教育、就业或社会融合机会。然而,在传统课堂中,这仍然是一个挑战,因为提供频繁、及时和个性化的反馈并不总是可能的。分析学可以通过提供这样的反馈来支撑英语学习者的写作发展。为了设计这些分析,我们进行了一项实地研究,分析了移民成年ELLs(写作分析研究中经常被忽视的群体)的论文样本,并确定了他们的认知信念和学习动机。我们在学习者的个体差异和写作样本中的错误模式中确定了共同的主题。该研究揭示了认知写作信念和学习策略之间的强烈联系。研究结果用于制定成人ELLs写作分析设计指南,并为该群体的写作发展提出分析思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The half-life of MOOC knowledge: a randomized trial evaluating knowledge retention and retrieval practice in MOOCs The influence of students' cognitive and motivational characteristics on students' use of a 4C/ID-based online learning environment and their learning gain Connecting decentralized learning records: a blockchain based learning analytics platform Towards a writing analytics framework for adult english language learners Gaze insights into debugging behavior using learner-centred analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1