Implementation of Random Forest Regression for COCOMO II Effort Estimation

Ilham Cahya Suherman, R. Sarno, Sholiq
{"title":"Implementation of Random Forest Regression for COCOMO II Effort Estimation","authors":"Ilham Cahya Suherman, R. Sarno, Sholiq","doi":"10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of Project Manager early activity is to estimate time, and cost based on given scope, which can help project manager to plan schedule and used resources. Estimation is very important in project management because a bad result of estimation will result in bad management of project and may cause failure. There are methods that can be used to estimate software development effort; COCOMO II is one method that commonly used. Many researcher before have been used algorithm, such as Bat, Bee Colony, or MOPSO to increase COCOMO II estimation accuracy. However, as the technology advanced, there are a lot more options that can be used to predict software effort estimation based on COCOMO, such as machine learning. In this paper, we compare machine learning algorithm with tuning parameter method to know whether tuning parameter estimation is better than machine learning estimation or vice versa. In this paper, we use Random Forest Regression as machine learning algorithm to estimate the effort. We also compare it with another machine learning algorithm, Support Vector Regression, and Bee Colony Method as parameter tuning method. The results of experiment is evaluated by their error rate. The results show that Random Forest Regression is better than Support Vector Regression and Bee Colony Method.","PeriodicalId":345558,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One of Project Manager early activity is to estimate time, and cost based on given scope, which can help project manager to plan schedule and used resources. Estimation is very important in project management because a bad result of estimation will result in bad management of project and may cause failure. There are methods that can be used to estimate software development effort; COCOMO II is one method that commonly used. Many researcher before have been used algorithm, such as Bat, Bee Colony, or MOPSO to increase COCOMO II estimation accuracy. However, as the technology advanced, there are a lot more options that can be used to predict software effort estimation based on COCOMO, such as machine learning. In this paper, we compare machine learning algorithm with tuning parameter method to know whether tuning parameter estimation is better than machine learning estimation or vice versa. In this paper, we use Random Forest Regression as machine learning algorithm to estimate the effort. We also compare it with another machine learning algorithm, Support Vector Regression, and Bee Colony Method as parameter tuning method. The results of experiment is evaluated by their error rate. The results show that Random Forest Regression is better than Support Vector Regression and Bee Colony Method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机森林回归在COCOMO II工作量估计中的实现
项目经理的早期活动之一是根据给定的范围估计时间和成本,这可以帮助项目经理计划进度和使用的资源。评估在项目管理中是非常重要的,因为一个糟糕的评估结果将导致项目管理不善,甚至可能导致失败。有一些方法可以用来评估软件开发工作;COCOMO II是常用的一种方法。在此之前,许多研究者已经使用了蝙蝠、蜂群或MOPSO等算法来提高COCOMO II的估计精度。然而,随着技术的进步,有更多的选择可以用来预测基于COCOMO的软件工作量估计,比如机器学习。在本文中,我们将机器学习算法与调优参数方法进行比较,以了解调优参数估计是否优于机器学习估计,反之亦然。在本文中,我们使用随机森林回归作为机器学习算法来估计工作量。我们还将其与另一种机器学习算法,支持向量回归和蜂群方法作为参数调整方法进行了比较。用它们的错误率来评价实验结果。结果表明,随机森林回归方法优于支持向量回归和蜂群回归方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Independent Public Video Conference Network Sentiment Analysis of Yelp Review Extrovert and Introvert Classification based on Myers-Briggs Type Indicator(MBTI) using Support Vector Machine (SVM) Brain Segmentation using Adaptive Thresholding, K-Means Clustering and Mathematical Morphology in MRI Data Handwriting Recognition of Hiragana Characters using Convolutional Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1