The Population Density Map of the Greater Cairo Region Comparison of 2017 Choropleth Map and Dasymetric Map

Asmaa H. Rasslan, Abdalla Sameh
{"title":"The Population Density Map of the Greater Cairo Region Comparison of 2017 Choropleth Map and Dasymetric Map","authors":"Asmaa H. Rasslan, Abdalla Sameh","doi":"10.9734/ajgr/2022/v5i1123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the choropleth method is considered among the easiest cartographic methods, it lacks accurate representation of the real population density. In this regard, dasymetric maps offer the better alternative, especially for heterogonous spaces and those exhibit intense spatial dynamic, like the Greater Cairo Region, which has the highest population and population density among various Egyptian governorates. The current study aims mainly at comparing the dasymetric mapping technique with the choropleth mapping technique for studying the population density in the Greater Cairo Region. To this end, the satellite image processing and ArcGIS (version 10.6.1) were used. For instance, it was found, in the choropleth map, that the population density category ranged from 161.415 to 270.922 person per km2 occupied 1% of the total area of 1481 km2; whereas, in the dasymetric map, the population density category ranged from 139.986 to 761044 person per km2 concentrated in only 0.4% of the total area of 648 km2. Thus it is clear that the dasymetric mapping technique is more representative of the realistic population density distribution, because it eliminates all land uses except the residential land use. Conclusively, it is highly recommended to use the dasymetric mapping technique rather than the choropleth method.","PeriodicalId":106705,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Geographical Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajgr/2022/v5i1123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the choropleth method is considered among the easiest cartographic methods, it lacks accurate representation of the real population density. In this regard, dasymetric maps offer the better alternative, especially for heterogonous spaces and those exhibit intense spatial dynamic, like the Greater Cairo Region, which has the highest population and population density among various Egyptian governorates. The current study aims mainly at comparing the dasymetric mapping technique with the choropleth mapping technique for studying the population density in the Greater Cairo Region. To this end, the satellite image processing and ArcGIS (version 10.6.1) were used. For instance, it was found, in the choropleth map, that the population density category ranged from 161.415 to 270.922 person per km2 occupied 1% of the total area of 1481 km2; whereas, in the dasymetric map, the population density category ranged from 139.986 to 761044 person per km2 concentrated in only 0.4% of the total area of 648 km2. Thus it is clear that the dasymetric mapping technique is more representative of the realistic population density distribution, because it eliminates all land uses except the residential land use. Conclusively, it is highly recommended to use the dasymetric mapping technique rather than the choropleth method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017年大开罗地区人口密度图与非对称图比较
虽然该方法被认为是最简单的制图方法之一,但它缺乏对真实人口密度的准确表示。在这方面,非对称地图提供了更好的选择,特别是对于异质空间和那些表现出强烈空间动态的空间,如大开罗地区,它在埃及各省份中拥有最高的人口和人口密度。本研究的主要目的是比较非对称测绘技术和choropleth测绘技术,以研究大开罗地区的人口密度。为此,使用了卫星图像处理和ArcGIS(10.6.1版本)。例如,在地图集上,人口密度类别为161.415 ~ 270.922人/ km2,占总面积1481 km2的1%;而在非对称图中,人口密度类别为139.986 ~ 761044人/ km2,仅集中在总面积648 km2的0.4%。因此,很明显,非对称测绘技术更能代表现实的人口密度分布,因为它消除了除住宅用地外的所有土地利用。最后,强烈建议使用非对称映射技术,而不是choropleth方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Assessment of the Downstream Effect of Dams on Livelihood Vulnerability of Riparian Dwellers: A Case of Mukutmanipur Dam, Kangsabati River, Eastern India Site Selection for Wind Energy as an Alternative Source of Energy in Bonny, Nigeria Perception of Adaptation Strategies to Climate Variability in Machakos County, Kenya The Geophysical Investigation of Leachate Formation in Mgbuka Obosi, Idemili North Local Government Area of Anambra State, Nigeria Evaluation and Impact of Stakeholders on the Sustainable Ibadan Project's (SIP): A Case Study of Potable Water Projects in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1