A Literature Review: Solving Constrained Non-Linear Bi-Level Optimization Problems With Classical Methods

Arpan Biswas, C. Hoyle
{"title":"A Literature Review: Solving Constrained Non-Linear Bi-Level Optimization Problems With Classical Methods","authors":"Arpan Biswas, C. Hoyle","doi":"10.1115/detc2019-97192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Bi-level optimization is an emerging scope of research which consists of two optimization problems, where the lower-level optimization problem is nested into the upper-level problem as a constraint. Bi-level programming has gained much attention recently for practical applications. Bi-level Programming Problems (BLPP) can be solved with classical and heuristic optimization methods. However, applying heuristic methods, though easier to formulate for realistic complex design, are likely to be too computationally expensive for solving bi-level problems, especially when the problem has high function evaluation cost associated with handling large number of constraint functions. Thus, classical approaches are investigated in this paper. As we present, there appears to be no universally best classical method for solving any kind of NP-hard BLPP problem in terms of accuracy to finding true optimal solutions and minimal computational costs. This could cause a dilemma to the researcher in choosing an appropriate classical approach to solve a BLPP in different domains and levels of complexities. Therefore, this motivates us to provide a detailed literature review and a comparative study of the work done to date on applying different classical approaches in solving constrained non-linear, bi-level optimization problems considering continuous design variables and no discontinuity in functions.","PeriodicalId":198662,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2B: 45th Design Automation Conference","volume":"46 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2B: 45th Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Bi-level optimization is an emerging scope of research which consists of two optimization problems, where the lower-level optimization problem is nested into the upper-level problem as a constraint. Bi-level programming has gained much attention recently for practical applications. Bi-level Programming Problems (BLPP) can be solved with classical and heuristic optimization methods. However, applying heuristic methods, though easier to formulate for realistic complex design, are likely to be too computationally expensive for solving bi-level problems, especially when the problem has high function evaluation cost associated with handling large number of constraint functions. Thus, classical approaches are investigated in this paper. As we present, there appears to be no universally best classical method for solving any kind of NP-hard BLPP problem in terms of accuracy to finding true optimal solutions and minimal computational costs. This could cause a dilemma to the researcher in choosing an appropriate classical approach to solve a BLPP in different domains and levels of complexities. Therefore, this motivates us to provide a detailed literature review and a comparative study of the work done to date on applying different classical approaches in solving constrained non-linear, bi-level optimization problems considering continuous design variables and no discontinuity in functions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文献综述:用经典方法求解约束非线性双水平优化问题
双层优化是一个新兴的研究领域,它由两个优化问题组成,其中下层优化问题作为约束嵌套到上层问题中。近年来,双层编程在实际应用中受到了广泛的关注。双层规划问题可以用经典优化方法和启发式优化方法求解。然而,应用启发式方法,虽然更容易为现实的复杂设计制定,但对于解决双层次问题来说,计算成本可能太高,特别是当问题具有与处理大量约束函数相关的高函数评估成本时。因此,本文对经典方法进行了研究。正如我们所提出的,在找到真正的最优解和最小计算成本的准确性方面,似乎没有普遍最好的经典方法来解决任何一种NP-hard BLPP问题。这可能导致研究者在选择合适的经典方法来解决不同领域和复杂程度的BLPP问题时陷入困境。因此,这促使我们提供详细的文献综述,并对迄今为止应用不同经典方法解决考虑连续设计变量和函数不间断的约束非线性双水平优化问题的工作进行比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Goal-Oriented, Inverse Decision-Based Method for an American Football Helmet System Reliability Analysis With Second Order Saddlepoint Approximation A Literature Review: Solving Constrained Non-Linear Bi-Level Optimization Problems With Classical Methods Confidence-Based Design Optimization Under Data Uncertainty Using Most Probable Point-Based Approach An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Clean Technologies Adoption Using Theory of Planned Behavior Based Decision-Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1