An Ontology for Standardising Trustworthy AI

D. Lewis, David Filip, H. Pandit
{"title":"An Ontology for Standardising Trustworthy AI","authors":"D. Lewis, David Filip, H. Pandit","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.97478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, there are a multiplicity of parallel activities being undertaken in developing international standards, regulations and individual organisational policies related to AI and its trustworthiness characteristics. The current lack of mappings between these activities presents the danger of a highly fragmented global landscape emerging in AI trustworthiness. This could present society, government and industry with competing standards, regulations and organisational practices that will then serve to undermine rather than build trust in AI. This chapter presents a simple ontology that can be used for checking the consistency and overlap of concepts from different standards, regulations and policies. The concepts in this ontology are grounded in an overview of AI standardisation currently being undertaken in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 and identifies its project to define an AI management system standard (AIMS or ISO/IEC WD 42001) as the starting point for establishing conceptual mapping between different initiatives. We propose a minimal, high level ontology for the support of conceptual mapping between different documents and show in the first instance how this can help map out the overlaps and gaps between and among SC 42 standards currently under development.","PeriodicalId":157665,"journal":{"name":"Factoring Ethics in Technology, Policy Making and Regulation [Working Title]","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Factoring Ethics in Technology, Policy Making and Regulation [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.97478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Worldwide, there are a multiplicity of parallel activities being undertaken in developing international standards, regulations and individual organisational policies related to AI and its trustworthiness characteristics. The current lack of mappings between these activities presents the danger of a highly fragmented global landscape emerging in AI trustworthiness. This could present society, government and industry with competing standards, regulations and organisational practices that will then serve to undermine rather than build trust in AI. This chapter presents a simple ontology that can be used for checking the consistency and overlap of concepts from different standards, regulations and policies. The concepts in this ontology are grounded in an overview of AI standardisation currently being undertaken in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 and identifies its project to define an AI management system standard (AIMS or ISO/IEC WD 42001) as the starting point for establishing conceptual mapping between different initiatives. We propose a minimal, high level ontology for the support of conceptual mapping between different documents and show in the first instance how this can help map out the overlaps and gaps between and among SC 42 standards currently under development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化可信赖AI的本体
在世界范围内,在制定与人工智能及其可信度特征相关的国际标准、法规和个人组织政策方面,正在开展多种平行活动。目前这些活动之间缺乏映射,这表明人工智能可信度出现高度碎片化的全球格局的危险。这可能会给社会、政府和行业带来相互竞争的标准、法规和组织实践,从而破坏而不是建立对人工智能的信任。本章提供了一个简单的本体,可用于检查来自不同标准、法规和政策的概念的一致性和重叠。本本体中的概念以ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42目前正在进行的人工智能标准化概述为基础,并确定其定义人工智能管理系统标准(AIMS或ISO/IEC WD 42001)的项目,作为在不同计划之间建立概念映射的起点。我们提出了一个最小的、高层次的本体来支持不同文档之间的概念映射,并在第一个实例中展示了它如何帮助绘制出目前正在开发的SC 42标准之间的重叠和差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Privacy Threats and Privacy Preservation Techniques in Data Analytics The Rise of Virtual Reality in Online Courses: Ethical Issues and Policy Recommendations The Desirability of a Future Integrated Reporting in the Study of Social and Innovative Practices Technological Approach to Ensure Ethical Procurement Management An Ontology for Standardising Trustworthy AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1