A deeper understanding of re-use

S. Wills, Lori Lockyer, Shirley Agostinho, N. Cooper
{"title":"A deeper understanding of re-use","authors":"S. Wills, Lori Lockyer, Shirley Agostinho, N. Cooper","doi":"10.1109/CICEM.2013.6820228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Understanding what influences reuse of designs, activities and `in the wild' continues to prove tantalizingly elusive for researchers. The uncertainty of the process and the length of time between the offer and take up of resources in education can represent a process spanning several years. Education is frequently a long game and the influence of context, the desire or need to recontextualise and repurpose makes tracking reuse a difficult process. What is needed is both a broad and deep understanding of what occur when designs, activities and resources with potential for reuse are encountered in practice. This paper draws on two longitudinal case-based studies drawn from across a decade and across the globe. Both researchers are also educational practitioners, Teaching Fellows in Australia (Sandra Wills) and England (Chris Pegler), which has provided an access and closeness to their cases, and the networks of their case participants, which is unusual. Their independently conceived and executed investigations into factors shed light on what influences re-use of designs, activities, and resources. Comparison of their conclusions and analysis reveals a general consistency in the factor types identified and a common focus on the influence, complexity and importance of context. Mapping the two studies, both representing extensive doctoral research by Wills (Wills, 2010) and Pegler (Pegler, 2011) also revealed the differences that merit further investigation in this paper. The analysis here centres on enhancing understanding of thresholds for re-use exploring the wider relevance of specific issues highlighted in the studies around what Pegler describes as “zones of proximity” and what are termed by Wills as “nuances of re-use”.","PeriodicalId":171189,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM)","volume":"46 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CICEM.2013.6820228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary form only given. Understanding what influences reuse of designs, activities and `in the wild' continues to prove tantalizingly elusive for researchers. The uncertainty of the process and the length of time between the offer and take up of resources in education can represent a process spanning several years. Education is frequently a long game and the influence of context, the desire or need to recontextualise and repurpose makes tracking reuse a difficult process. What is needed is both a broad and deep understanding of what occur when designs, activities and resources with potential for reuse are encountered in practice. This paper draws on two longitudinal case-based studies drawn from across a decade and across the globe. Both researchers are also educational practitioners, Teaching Fellows in Australia (Sandra Wills) and England (Chris Pegler), which has provided an access and closeness to their cases, and the networks of their case participants, which is unusual. Their independently conceived and executed investigations into factors shed light on what influences re-use of designs, activities, and resources. Comparison of their conclusions and analysis reveals a general consistency in the factor types identified and a common focus on the influence, complexity and importance of context. Mapping the two studies, both representing extensive doctoral research by Wills (Wills, 2010) and Pegler (Pegler, 2011) also revealed the differences that merit further investigation in this paper. The analysis here centres on enhancing understanding of thresholds for re-use exploring the wider relevance of specific issues highlighted in the studies around what Pegler describes as “zones of proximity” and what are termed by Wills as “nuances of re-use”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更深入地理解重用
只提供摘要形式。对于研究人员来说,理解是什么影响了设计、活动和“在野外”的重用,仍然是一个难以捉摸的问题。这个过程的不确定性,以及从提供教育资源到使用教育资源之间的时间长度,可能代表一个跨越数年的过程。教育通常是一个漫长的过程,并且受上下文的影响,重新上下文化和重新用途的愿望或需要使得跟踪重用成为一个困难的过程。我们需要的是对在实践中遇到具有重用潜力的设计、活动和资源时会发生什么有一个广泛而深刻的理解。本文借鉴了两项纵向案例研究,这些研究来自十年来全球各地。两位研究人员同时也是教育从业者,分别在澳大利亚(桑德拉·威尔斯)和英国(克里斯·佩格勒)担任教学研究员,这为他们提供了接触和接近案例的机会,以及案例参与者的网络,这是不寻常的。他们独立构思和执行的调查揭示了影响设计、活动和资源重用的因素。对其结论和分析的比较表明,所确定的因素类型总体上是一致的,并共同关注环境的影响、复杂性和重要性。这两项研究都代表了Wills (Wills, 2010)和Pegler (Pegler, 2011)的广泛博士研究,对这两项研究的映射也揭示了值得本文进一步研究的差异。这里的分析集中在加强对重用阈值的理解,探索Pegler所描述的“邻近区域”和Wills所称的“重用的细微差别”的研究中突出的具体问题的更广泛的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teachers as game designers: Using a game in formal learning in a Singapore primary school A study on the academic uses of facebook in Vocational Education “Why can't we always learn like this?” Games-based learning and the English language arts classroom: Lessons learned and practical applications Case-based approach to evolution through study of animal behavior A deeper understanding of re-use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1