Testing the middle income trap for upper middle income countries by fourier cointegration

A. Peker, Merve Nur Çak
{"title":"Testing the middle income trap for upper middle income countries by fourier cointegration","authors":"A. Peker, Merve Nur Çak","doi":"10.15637/jlecon.9.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The middle income trap is defined as the inability to rise to a higher income group after the gross domestic product value reaches the middle income level and is stuck in a certain income range. Based on this point, the data used in the study covers the period 1960-2019. The middle income trap hypothesis was tested for upper middle income country groups in 2019 and has been included in the 22 countries included in the study. The per capita Gross Domestic Product data for the mentioned countries and the reference country were obtained from the World Bank database. In the study, in order to perform the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test, the variables used in the analysis should be first-order I (1) stationary. For this reason, before the cointegration test, Ng-Perron Test (2001), Enders and Lee (2012) Fourier Function Stationarity Test, Christopoulos and Leon Ledesma (2010) Fourier CSR Stability tests were performed to determine the stationarity levels of variables. And then the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test was applied to the above-mentioned 16 countries. According to the results of Fourier ADL Cointegration, the null hypothesis, which asserts that there is no cointegration for Botswana, Brazil, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Fiji, Gabon, Guatemala, Iran, Jamaica, Malaysia, Peru, South Africa, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, including Turkey cannot be rejected within 5% significance level. Therefore, empirical evidence has been obtained that these countries are in the middle income trap.","PeriodicalId":158468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Life Economics","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Life Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.9.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The middle income trap is defined as the inability to rise to a higher income group after the gross domestic product value reaches the middle income level and is stuck in a certain income range. Based on this point, the data used in the study covers the period 1960-2019. The middle income trap hypothesis was tested for upper middle income country groups in 2019 and has been included in the 22 countries included in the study. The per capita Gross Domestic Product data for the mentioned countries and the reference country were obtained from the World Bank database. In the study, in order to perform the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test, the variables used in the analysis should be first-order I (1) stationary. For this reason, before the cointegration test, Ng-Perron Test (2001), Enders and Lee (2012) Fourier Function Stationarity Test, Christopoulos and Leon Ledesma (2010) Fourier CSR Stability tests were performed to determine the stationarity levels of variables. And then the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test was applied to the above-mentioned 16 countries. According to the results of Fourier ADL Cointegration, the null hypothesis, which asserts that there is no cointegration for Botswana, Brazil, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Fiji, Gabon, Guatemala, Iran, Jamaica, Malaysia, Peru, South Africa, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, including Turkey cannot be rejected within 5% significance level. Therefore, empirical evidence has been obtained that these countries are in the middle income trap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用傅里叶协整检验中高收入国家的中等收入陷阱
中等收入陷阱的定义是,国内生产总值(gdp)达到中等收入水平后,在一定的收入范围内无法上升到更高的收入群体。基于这一点,研究中使用的数据涵盖了1960年至2019年期间。2019年,中等收入陷阱假说在中高收入国家群体中进行了检验,并被纳入研究的22个国家。上述国家和参考国家的人均国内生产总值数据来自世界银行数据库。在本研究中,为了进行Banerjee Arcabic Lee(2017)傅里叶ADL协整检验,分析中使用的变量应为一阶I(1)平稳。为此,在进行协整检验之前,先进行了Ng-Perron检验(2001)、Enders and Lee(2012)傅立叶函数平稳性检验、Christopoulos and Leon Ledesma(2010)傅立叶CSR稳定性检验来确定变量的平稳性水平。然后对上述16个国家进行Banerjee Arcabic Lee(2017)傅里叶ADL协整检验。根据傅里叶ADL协整的结果,零假设认为博茨瓦纳、巴西、中国、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、斐济、加蓬、危地马拉、伊朗、牙买加、马来西亚、秘鲁、南非、苏里南、特立尼达和多巴哥,包括土耳其不存在协整,在5%的显著性水平内不能被拒绝。因此,经验证据表明,这些国家处于中等收入陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gezegensel sınırlar eşiğinde sağlık işletmelerinde performans ölçüm ve raporlamasına yönelik vizyon arayışları: (balanced score card / entegre raporlama) 2008 Ekonomik krizi ve pandemi krizi çerçevesinde kamu maliyesinin önemi* Modeling challenges to implement HR analytics in IT sector using ISM Beyond interaction: Generative AI in conversational marketing - foundations, developments, and future directions Bankacılık sektöründe dijitalleşme düzeyinin dijital bankacilik uygulamalarına etkisi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1