{"title":"Testing the middle income trap for upper middle income countries by fourier cointegration","authors":"A. Peker, Merve Nur Çak","doi":"10.15637/jlecon.9.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The middle income trap is defined as the inability to rise to a higher income group after the gross domestic product value reaches the middle income level and is stuck in a certain income range. Based on this point, the data used in the study covers the period 1960-2019. The middle income trap hypothesis was tested for upper middle income country groups in 2019 and has been included in the 22 countries included in the study. The per capita Gross Domestic Product data for the mentioned countries and the reference country were obtained from the World Bank database. In the study, in order to perform the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test, the variables used in the analysis should be first-order I (1) stationary. For this reason, before the cointegration test, Ng-Perron Test (2001), Enders and Lee (2012) Fourier Function Stationarity Test, Christopoulos and Leon Ledesma (2010) Fourier CSR Stability tests were performed to determine the stationarity levels of variables. And then the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test was applied to the above-mentioned 16 countries. According to the results of Fourier ADL Cointegration, the null hypothesis, which asserts that there is no cointegration for Botswana, Brazil, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Fiji, Gabon, Guatemala, Iran, Jamaica, Malaysia, Peru, South Africa, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, including Turkey cannot be rejected within 5% significance level. Therefore, empirical evidence has been obtained that these countries are in the middle income trap.","PeriodicalId":158468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Life Economics","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Life Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.9.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The middle income trap is defined as the inability to rise to a higher income group after the gross domestic product value reaches the middle income level and is stuck in a certain income range. Based on this point, the data used in the study covers the period 1960-2019. The middle income trap hypothesis was tested for upper middle income country groups in 2019 and has been included in the 22 countries included in the study. The per capita Gross Domestic Product data for the mentioned countries and the reference country were obtained from the World Bank database. In the study, in order to perform the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test, the variables used in the analysis should be first-order I (1) stationary. For this reason, before the cointegration test, Ng-Perron Test (2001), Enders and Lee (2012) Fourier Function Stationarity Test, Christopoulos and Leon Ledesma (2010) Fourier CSR Stability tests were performed to determine the stationarity levels of variables. And then the Banerjee Arcabic Lee (2017) Fourier ADL cointegration test was applied to the above-mentioned 16 countries. According to the results of Fourier ADL Cointegration, the null hypothesis, which asserts that there is no cointegration for Botswana, Brazil, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Fiji, Gabon, Guatemala, Iran, Jamaica, Malaysia, Peru, South Africa, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, including Turkey cannot be rejected within 5% significance level. Therefore, empirical evidence has been obtained that these countries are in the middle income trap.
中等收入陷阱的定义是,国内生产总值(gdp)达到中等收入水平后,在一定的收入范围内无法上升到更高的收入群体。基于这一点,研究中使用的数据涵盖了1960年至2019年期间。2019年,中等收入陷阱假说在中高收入国家群体中进行了检验,并被纳入研究的22个国家。上述国家和参考国家的人均国内生产总值数据来自世界银行数据库。在本研究中,为了进行Banerjee Arcabic Lee(2017)傅里叶ADL协整检验,分析中使用的变量应为一阶I(1)平稳。为此,在进行协整检验之前,先进行了Ng-Perron检验(2001)、Enders and Lee(2012)傅立叶函数平稳性检验、Christopoulos and Leon Ledesma(2010)傅立叶CSR稳定性检验来确定变量的平稳性水平。然后对上述16个国家进行Banerjee Arcabic Lee(2017)傅里叶ADL协整检验。根据傅里叶ADL协整的结果,零假设认为博茨瓦纳、巴西、中国、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、斐济、加蓬、危地马拉、伊朗、牙买加、马来西亚、秘鲁、南非、苏里南、特立尼达和多巴哥,包括土耳其不存在协整,在5%的显著性水平内不能被拒绝。因此,经验证据表明,这些国家处于中等收入陷阱。