Literalität in kinderund jugendliterarischen Werken

Ksenia Kuzminykh
{"title":"Literalität in kinderund jugendliterarischen Werken","authors":"Ksenia Kuzminykh","doi":"10.14746/gl.2019.46.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article starts with a discussion of the essential theories of literature. It focuses on the historical development of books for children and young-adults. Worldwide there are three childhood myths, which are unfolded in successful children's books and which correspond to socially conditioned concepts of childhood. The Enlightenment childhood utopia sees children as promising for the future and improving human relationships. This idea explains the phenomenal resonance of books with educational and instructive concepts. In the 20th and 21st centuries this concept has become very popular again. By contrast, Romanticism developed another, second childhood myth, which combines not a future but a paradisiacal past with the image of childhood. In doing so, the holistic and naive childlike world reference is stylized into an ideal that expresses the backward-looking yearning of adults. In addition to the Enlightenment and the Romantic childhood myths, there is a third, a negative view of childhood, which has also found expression in children's classics worldwide. This refers to the myth of the evil child, who is originally committed to the Christian doctrine of original sin. In the next step the article traces different modes of reading. These are the literary mode and documentary/pragmatic mode. Then, based on fragments taken from children’s and juvenile books from different periods, the article demonstrates the role of literacy in texts written for children and young adults, and the role of children and young-adult books for reading competence. While the paper examines these ideas within different novels though history, it also raises questions about the aesthetics and epistemic value of literature","PeriodicalId":212023,"journal":{"name":"Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2019.46.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article starts with a discussion of the essential theories of literature. It focuses on the historical development of books for children and young-adults. Worldwide there are three childhood myths, which are unfolded in successful children's books and which correspond to socially conditioned concepts of childhood. The Enlightenment childhood utopia sees children as promising for the future and improving human relationships. This idea explains the phenomenal resonance of books with educational and instructive concepts. In the 20th and 21st centuries this concept has become very popular again. By contrast, Romanticism developed another, second childhood myth, which combines not a future but a paradisiacal past with the image of childhood. In doing so, the holistic and naive childlike world reference is stylized into an ideal that expresses the backward-looking yearning of adults. In addition to the Enlightenment and the Romantic childhood myths, there is a third, a negative view of childhood, which has also found expression in children's classics worldwide. This refers to the myth of the evil child, who is originally committed to the Christian doctrine of original sin. In the next step the article traces different modes of reading. These are the literary mode and documentary/pragmatic mode. Then, based on fragments taken from children’s and juvenile books from different periods, the article demonstrates the role of literacy in texts written for children and young adults, and the role of children and young-adult books for reading competence. While the paper examines these ideas within different novels though history, it also raises questions about the aesthetics and epistemic value of literature
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文首先讨论了文学的基本理论。它侧重于儿童和青少年书籍的历史发展。在世界范围内,有三种童年神话,它们在成功的儿童书籍中展开,并与社会条件下的童年概念相对应。启蒙运动的童年乌托邦将孩子视为未来的希望和改善人际关系的力量。这一观点解释了书籍与教育和教育概念的现象共振。在20世纪和21世纪,这个概念再次变得非常流行。相比之下,浪漫主义发展了另一种,第二童年神话,它结合了童年的形象,而不是未来,而是天堂般的过去。在这样做的过程中,整体和天真的儿童世界的参考被风格化成一种理想,表达了成年人向后看的渴望。除了启蒙运动和浪漫主义的童年神话,还有第三种,对童年的消极看法,也在世界各地的儿童经典中得到了表达。这指的是邪恶的孩子的神话,他最初致力于基督教的原罪教义。接下来,文章对不同的阅读模式进行了探讨。它们是文学模式和文献/语用模式。然后,基于不同时期儿童和青少年书籍的片段,本文论证了读写能力在儿童和青少年文本中的作用,以及儿童和青少年书籍对阅读能力的作用。本文在从历史的角度考察不同小说中的这些思想的同时,也提出了关于文学的美学和认识价值的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La conscience et l’autoconscience des futurs formateurs de FLE dans le développement de la compétence interculturelle Sylwia Adamczak‑Krysztofowicz / Anna Szczepaniak‑Kozak / Paweł Piotr Rybszleger (Hrsg.). Angewandte Linguistik – Neue Herausforderungen und Konzepte. Festschrift für Izabela Prokop zum 70. Geburtstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 2020. S. 453 Conscience et autoconscience dans l’enseignement / apprentissage d’une langue-culture : pourquoi ? quoi ? comment ? Le rôle de l’apprentissage informel du FLE dans la stimulation de la conscience et de l’autoconscience métacognitive des étudiants de philologie française. Exemple des films et séries francophones Jeunes migrants en France. Des activités plurilittéraciques pour un parcours réflexif
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1