Measuring the accuracy of open-source payload-based traffic classifiers using popular Internet applications

S. Alcock, R. Nelson
{"title":"Measuring the accuracy of open-source payload-based traffic classifiers using popular Internet applications","authors":"S. Alcock, R. Nelson","doi":"10.1109/LCNW.2013.6758538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open-source payload-based traffic classifiers are frequently used as a source of ground truth in the traffic classification research field. However, there have been no comprehensive studies that provide evidence that the classifications produced by these software tools are sufficiently accurate for this purpose. In this paper, we present the results of an investigation into the accuracy of four open-source traffic classifiers (L7 Filter, nDPI, libprotoident and tstat) using packet traces captured while using a known selection of common Internet applications, including streaming video, Steam and World of Warcraft. Our results show that nDPI and libprotoident provide the highest accuracy among the evaluated traffic classifiers, whereas L7 Filter is unreliable and should not be used as a source of ground truth.","PeriodicalId":290924,"journal":{"name":"38th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks - Workshops","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"38th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks - Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCNW.2013.6758538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Open-source payload-based traffic classifiers are frequently used as a source of ground truth in the traffic classification research field. However, there have been no comprehensive studies that provide evidence that the classifications produced by these software tools are sufficiently accurate for this purpose. In this paper, we present the results of an investigation into the accuracy of four open-source traffic classifiers (L7 Filter, nDPI, libprotoident and tstat) using packet traces captured while using a known selection of common Internet applications, including streaming video, Steam and World of Warcraft. Our results show that nDPI and libprotoident provide the highest accuracy among the evaluated traffic classifiers, whereas L7 Filter is unreliable and should not be used as a source of ground truth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用流行的Internet应用程序测量基于开源有效负载的流量分类器的准确性
开源的基于有效负载的流量分类器在流量分类研究领域中经常被用作地面真相的来源。然而,还没有全面的研究提供证据,证明这些软件工具产生的分类对于这一目的是足够准确的。在本文中,我们展示了对四个开源流量分类器(L7 Filter, nDPI, libprotoident和tstat)的准确性的调查结果,使用在使用已知的常见互联网应用程序(包括流媒体视频,Steam和魔兽世界)时捕获的数据包跟踪。我们的结果表明,在评估的流量分类器中,nDPI和libprotoident提供了最高的准确性,而L7 Filter是不可靠的,不应该用作地面真相的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An investigation into teredo and 6to4 transition mechanisms: Traffic analysis Enhancing safety messages dissemination over 802.11p/DSRC Open M2M data - Position paper Insights of file-sharing system forums Measuring the accuracy of open-source payload-based traffic classifiers using popular Internet applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1