“As Long As We Have the Mine, We'll Have Water”: Exploring Water Insecurity in Appalachia

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Annals of Anthropological Practice Pub Date : 2020-07-27 DOI:10.1111/napa.12134
Jennifer R. Wies, Alisha Mays, Shalean M. Collins, Sera L. Young
{"title":"“As Long As We Have the Mine, We'll Have Water”: Exploring Water Insecurity in Appalachia","authors":"Jennifer R. Wies,&nbsp;Alisha Mays,&nbsp;Shalean M. Collins,&nbsp;Sera L. Young","doi":"10.1111/napa.12134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Water insecurity is a condition when affordability, reliability, adequacy, or safety of water is significantly reduced or unattainable resulting in jeopardized well-being. Water insecurity co-occurs with poverty and social and economic exclusion. It is gaining increasing attention from the scholarly community, but most work has focused on low- and middle-income countries. In this article, we explore water insecurity in Appalachian Kentucky. Throughout the Appalachia region, water access and quality are compromised as a result of contamination from extractive industries (such as coal mining) and failure of infrastructure investment. The water problems have been reported by journalists, activists, and social and natural scientists who describe a reliance on discolored, sulfuric, and sometimes toxic water to meet household needs. In this article, we build upon applied anthropology studies of human–environment interaction to answer the exploratory question: “Do patterns about water acquisition and consumption exist in Appalachian Kentucky?” Our methodologies included participant observation and informal go-along interviews at three sites based on convenience. The results are presented with rich ethnographic description, and reveal that preferences are influenced by the costs of water, the availability of water from different sources (wells, taps, mines, rain capture, etc.), and historic use patterns. We call for a culturally and historically informed approach to understand and measure water insecurity and water improvement efforts in Appalachia. Our ability to characterize water insecurity in low-resource settings in the United States will allow for better understanding and visibility of the water-related experiences of marginalized communities and serve as powerful policy inputs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/napa.12134","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Water insecurity is a condition when affordability, reliability, adequacy, or safety of water is significantly reduced or unattainable resulting in jeopardized well-being. Water insecurity co-occurs with poverty and social and economic exclusion. It is gaining increasing attention from the scholarly community, but most work has focused on low- and middle-income countries. In this article, we explore water insecurity in Appalachian Kentucky. Throughout the Appalachia region, water access and quality are compromised as a result of contamination from extractive industries (such as coal mining) and failure of infrastructure investment. The water problems have been reported by journalists, activists, and social and natural scientists who describe a reliance on discolored, sulfuric, and sometimes toxic water to meet household needs. In this article, we build upon applied anthropology studies of human–environment interaction to answer the exploratory question: “Do patterns about water acquisition and consumption exist in Appalachian Kentucky?” Our methodologies included participant observation and informal go-along interviews at three sites based on convenience. The results are presented with rich ethnographic description, and reveal that preferences are influenced by the costs of water, the availability of water from different sources (wells, taps, mines, rain capture, etc.), and historic use patterns. We call for a culturally and historically informed approach to understand and measure water insecurity and water improvement efforts in Appalachia. Our ability to characterize water insecurity in low-resource settings in the United States will allow for better understanding and visibility of the water-related experiences of marginalized communities and serve as powerful policy inputs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“只要我们有矿,我们就会有水”:探索阿巴拉契亚地区的水安全问题
水不安全是指水的可负担性、可靠性、充足性或安全性大大降低或无法获得,从而危及福祉的一种情况。水不安全与贫困以及社会和经济排斥并存。它越来越受到学术界的关注,但大多数工作都集中在低收入和中等收入国家。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区的水安全问题。在整个阿巴拉契亚地区,由于采掘业(如煤矿开采)的污染和基础设施投资的失败,水的获取和质量受到损害。记者、活动家、社会和自然科学家都报道了水的问题,他们描述了对变色、含硫、有时有毒的水的依赖,以满足家庭需求。在这篇文章中,我们建立在人与环境相互作用的应用人类学研究的基础上,来回答这个探索性的问题:“在肯塔基州的阿巴拉契亚地区,水的获取和消耗模式存在吗?”我们的方法包括参与者观察和在三个地点进行的非正式随同访谈。研究结果以丰富的民族志描述呈现,并揭示了偏好受到水的成本、不同来源(水井、水龙头、矿山、雨水捕获等)的可用性和历史使用模式的影响。我们呼吁从文化和历史的角度来理解和衡量阿巴拉契亚地区的水不安全状况和改善水的努力。我们对美国低资源环境中水不安全特征的描述,将有助于更好地理解和了解边缘化社区与水有关的经历,并作为有力的政策投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Ethnography beyond thick data Diversity Human centered design for applied anthropology Applying up: How ethnographers powered public health changes in the United States during the COVID‐19 pandemic Anthropology at speed, at scale, in action: The CommuniVax example
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1