Applying up: How ethnographers powered public health changes in the United States during the COVID‐19 pandemic

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Annals of Anthropological Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1111/napa.12224
Monica Schoch‐Spana
{"title":"Applying up: How ethnographers powered public health changes in the United States during the COVID‐19 pandemic","authors":"Monica Schoch‐Spana","doi":"10.1111/napa.12224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Studying up” was Laura Nader's provocation to anthropologists to scrutinize the actions of the powerful few in relation to the ordeals of the powerless many. Engaging this lineage, this article describes CommuniVax, a rapid ethnographic research coalition supporting an equitable COVID‐19 vaccine rollout in the United States. By tapping hyperlocal knowledge as well as that held by public health and governmental authorities at higher reaches, the coalition opened the possibility for a more just pandemic response and stronger democratic institutions. The project also broke with prevailing features in the studying up tradition: It operated as a multidisciplinary collective rather than a lone ethnographer, partnered with elites rather than a priori holding them at arm's length, and emphasized pragmatic solutions over scholastic critiques. These departures embody an “applying up” modality, supporting the idea ethnographers have plural strategies for studying actors who exert strong influence over others’ lives.","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/napa.12224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Studying up” was Laura Nader's provocation to anthropologists to scrutinize the actions of the powerful few in relation to the ordeals of the powerless many. Engaging this lineage, this article describes CommuniVax, a rapid ethnographic research coalition supporting an equitable COVID‐19 vaccine rollout in the United States. By tapping hyperlocal knowledge as well as that held by public health and governmental authorities at higher reaches, the coalition opened the possibility for a more just pandemic response and stronger democratic institutions. The project also broke with prevailing features in the studying up tradition: It operated as a multidisciplinary collective rather than a lone ethnographer, partnered with elites rather than a priori holding them at arm's length, and emphasized pragmatic solutions over scholastic critiques. These departures embody an “applying up” modality, supporting the idea ethnographers have plural strategies for studying actors who exert strong influence over others’ lives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用起来:人种学者如何在 COVID-19 大流行期间推动美国公共卫生变革
劳拉-纳德(Laura Nader)曾向人类学家提出 "向上研究"(Studying up)的建议,要求他们仔细研究少数有权有势者的行为与大多数无权无势者的苦难之间的关系。根据这一思路,本文介绍了CommuniVax,一个支持在美国公平推广COVID-19疫苗的快速人种学研究联盟。通过发掘超本地知识以及公共卫生和政府部门掌握的高层知识,该联盟为更加公正地应对大流行病和加强民主体制提供了可能。该项目还打破了研究传统的普遍特征:它是一个多学科的集体,而不是一个孤独的民族学者;它与精英人士合作,而不是先验地与他们保持距离;它强调实用的解决方案,而不是学术性的批评。这些偏离体现了一种 "向上应用 "的模式,支持了民族学者拥有多元策略来研究对他人生活施加强大影响的行动者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Ethnography beyond thick data Diversity Human centered design for applied anthropology Applying up: How ethnographers powered public health changes in the United States during the COVID‐19 pandemic Anthropology at speed, at scale, in action: The CommuniVax example
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1