The Protestant Ethic in the Russian Context: Peter Struve and Sergey Bulgakov Read Max Weber (1907–1909)

A. Teslya
{"title":"The Protestant Ethic in the Russian Context: Peter Struve and Sergey Bulgakov Read Max Weber (1907–1909)","authors":"A. Teslya","doi":"10.17323/1728-192x-2019-2-107-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on two Russian interpretations of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, the first written by Peter Struve, whose reaction on Weber’s research was among the first in Russia, and the second by Sergey Bulgakov, who attempted a reinterpretation of Weber’s concepts with their subsequent application to the conditions of Imperial Russia. It is widely known that Max Weber had a number of well-educated readers in Russia. The first was Bogdan Kistiakowsky who was directly connected with Weber’s academic circle through his teacher, the prominent German jurist Georg Jellinek. Yet, this paper addresses the reflections of other intellectuals who belonged to the generation born in 1870s, including Peter Struve and Sergei Bulgakov and their younger fellows such as Semyon Frank who joined this intellectual circle through his older friend and supporter, Peter Struve. Despite the fact that Weber’s The Protestant Ethic did not cause intense intellectual debates in Russia during 1906-1910, Struve and Bulgakov were those who responded to the main arguments, providing two views on this classic book. Peter Struve proceeds from the premise of the loss by modern Christianity (both Western and Eastern) of an effective, real faith in the Resurrection, and the consequent impossibility of true religious community. As a result, Christianity turns out to be an asceticism exercised outside this world. Bulgakov’s analysis interprets the Weberian concept as a general model of the “deep idealistic enthusiasm” influence on economic life, and translates this reasoning into a pragmatic plane, that is, into the possibility of economic “pedagogics” and the rise of a “spirit” of a new economy as an alternative to capitalism.","PeriodicalId":128581,"journal":{"name":"The Contemporary Relevance of a Classic: Max Weber in the 21st Century","volume":"6 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Contemporary Relevance of a Classic: Max Weber in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2019-2-107-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper focuses on two Russian interpretations of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, the first written by Peter Struve, whose reaction on Weber’s research was among the first in Russia, and the second by Sergey Bulgakov, who attempted a reinterpretation of Weber’s concepts with their subsequent application to the conditions of Imperial Russia. It is widely known that Max Weber had a number of well-educated readers in Russia. The first was Bogdan Kistiakowsky who was directly connected with Weber’s academic circle through his teacher, the prominent German jurist Georg Jellinek. Yet, this paper addresses the reflections of other intellectuals who belonged to the generation born in 1870s, including Peter Struve and Sergei Bulgakov and their younger fellows such as Semyon Frank who joined this intellectual circle through his older friend and supporter, Peter Struve. Despite the fact that Weber’s The Protestant Ethic did not cause intense intellectual debates in Russia during 1906-1910, Struve and Bulgakov were those who responded to the main arguments, providing two views on this classic book. Peter Struve proceeds from the premise of the loss by modern Christianity (both Western and Eastern) of an effective, real faith in the Resurrection, and the consequent impossibility of true religious community. As a result, Christianity turns out to be an asceticism exercised outside this world. Bulgakov’s analysis interprets the Weberian concept as a general model of the “deep idealistic enthusiasm” influence on economic life, and translates this reasoning into a pragmatic plane, that is, into the possibility of economic “pedagogics” and the rise of a “spirit” of a new economy as an alternative to capitalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄国语境下的新教伦理:彼得·斯特鲁夫与谢尔盖·布尔加科夫解读马克斯·韦伯(1907-1909)
本文重点讨论了俄罗斯对《新教伦理与资本主义精神》的两种解释,第一种解释由彼得·斯特鲁夫(Peter Struve)撰写,他对韦伯研究的反应是俄罗斯最早的,第二种解释由谢尔盖·布尔加科夫(Sergey Bulgakov)撰写,他试图重新解释韦伯的概念,并将其随后应用于俄罗斯帝国的条件。众所周知,马克斯·韦伯在俄罗斯有许多受过良好教育的读者。第一个是Bogdan Kistiakowsky,他通过他的老师,著名的德国法学家Georg Jellinek与韦伯的学术圈有直接的联系。然而,本文讨论了其他19世纪70年代出生的知识分子的思考,包括彼得·斯特鲁夫和谢尔盖·布尔加科夫,以及他们的年轻人,如谢苗·弗兰克,他通过他的老朋友和支持者彼得·斯特鲁夫加入了这个知识分子圈子。尽管韦伯的《新教伦理》在1906-1910年间并没有在俄罗斯引起激烈的知识分子辩论,但斯特鲁夫和布尔加科夫是对主要论点作出回应的人,他们对这部经典著作提出了两种观点。彼得·斯特鲁夫从现代基督教(包括西方和东方)对复活的有效的、真正的信仰的丧失,以及由此导致的真正的宗教团体的不可能的前提出发。结果,基督教变成了一种在这个世界之外的禁欲主义。布尔加科夫的分析将韦伯的概念解释为“深刻的理想主义热情”对经济生活影响的一般模式,并将这种推理转化为实用主义层面,即经济“教育学”的可能性和新经济“精神”的兴起作为资本主义的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Protestant Ethic in the Russian Context: Peter Struve and Sergey Bulgakov Read Max Weber (1907–1909) The Soviet Version of Modernity: Weberian and Post-Weberian Perspectives From Weberian Bureaucracy to Networking Bureaucracy Max Weber and the November Revolution of 1918 in Germany; or, Why Bolshevism Had No Chance in the West Max Weber and the Great War: Personal Opinions and Essays as Historical Sociology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1