Social Noise and the Impact of Misinformation on COVID-19 Preventive Measures: Comparative Data Analysis Using Twitter Masking Hashtags

Manar Alsaid, Nayana Pampapura Madali
{"title":"Social Noise and the Impact of Misinformation on COVID-19 Preventive Measures: Comparative Data Analysis Using Twitter Masking Hashtags","authors":"Manar Alsaid, Nayana Pampapura Madali","doi":"10.1142/s021964922240007x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread transmission of misinformation regarding the COVID-19 pandemic on social media has become a severe concern for various reasons such as containing the spread of the virus, taking preventive measures, and so on. According to the recent studies, misinformation and conspiracy theories spread on social media have hampered efforts to limit the infection, which has been exacerbated in some instances by politicians and celebrities. Misunderstandings about COVID-19 and wearing a mask sparked much debate. As time went on, a sizable portion of the population continued to refuse to wear masks, owing to extrinsic considerations, such as politics, ideology, personal views, and health concerns. In this study, we look at the concerns surrounding three Twitter hashtags (#masks, #maskup, and #maskoff) in order to understand better how social noise can lead to unintended misinformation. Sentiment analysis, topic modelling, and contextual analysis were used to compare and contrast two datasets relevant to these hashtags, one gathered in 2020 and the other in 2021. According to sentiment analysis, people’s emotions differed between hashtags, and the majority of tweets were based on social media users’ personal opinions. Topic modelling results revealed the prevalence of social noise leading to the unintended spread of misinformation on Twitter. The content analysis results show that while the #maskoff hashtag is used to resist masking influenced by factors, such as misinformation, conspiracy theories, and ideology, the #masks and #maskup hashtags were generally positive and used more to raise awareness of the benefits of wearing masks.","PeriodicalId":127309,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Knowl. Manag.","volume":"357 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Knowl. Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s021964922240007x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread transmission of misinformation regarding the COVID-19 pandemic on social media has become a severe concern for various reasons such as containing the spread of the virus, taking preventive measures, and so on. According to the recent studies, misinformation and conspiracy theories spread on social media have hampered efforts to limit the infection, which has been exacerbated in some instances by politicians and celebrities. Misunderstandings about COVID-19 and wearing a mask sparked much debate. As time went on, a sizable portion of the population continued to refuse to wear masks, owing to extrinsic considerations, such as politics, ideology, personal views, and health concerns. In this study, we look at the concerns surrounding three Twitter hashtags (#masks, #maskup, and #maskoff) in order to understand better how social noise can lead to unintended misinformation. Sentiment analysis, topic modelling, and contextual analysis were used to compare and contrast two datasets relevant to these hashtags, one gathered in 2020 and the other in 2021. According to sentiment analysis, people’s emotions differed between hashtags, and the majority of tweets were based on social media users’ personal opinions. Topic modelling results revealed the prevalence of social noise leading to the unintended spread of misinformation on Twitter. The content analysis results show that while the #maskoff hashtag is used to resist masking influenced by factors, such as misinformation, conspiracy theories, and ideology, the #masks and #maskup hashtags were generally positive and used more to raise awareness of the benefits of wearing masks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会噪音和错误信息对COVID-19预防措施的影响:使用Twitter屏蔽标签的比较数据分析
关于新冠肺炎疫情的错误信息在社交媒体上广泛传播,出于遏制病毒传播、采取预防措施等各种原因,已成为人们严重关注的问题。根据最近的研究,在社交媒体上传播的错误信息和阴谋论阻碍了限制感染的努力,在某些情况下,政治家和名人加剧了这种感染。对COVID-19和戴口罩的误解引发了很多争论。随着时间的推移,由于政治、意识形态、个人观点和健康等外在因素的考虑,相当一部分人继续拒绝戴口罩。在这项研究中,我们研究了围绕三个Twitter标签(#mask, #maskup和#maskoff)的关注,以便更好地理解社会噪音如何导致意想不到的错误信息。使用情感分析、主题建模和上下文分析来比较和对比与这些标签相关的两个数据集,一个收集于2020年,另一个收集于2021年。根据情绪分析,人们的情绪在标签之间是不同的,大多数推文都是基于社交媒体用户的个人观点。话题建模结果显示,社交噪音的普遍存在导致了推特上错误信息的意外传播。内容分析结果显示,#maskoff标签被用来抵制受错误信息、阴谋论和意识形态等因素影响的面具,而#mask和#maskup标签总体上是积极的,更多地用于提高人们对戴面具好处的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Management in Higher Education in Vietnam: Insights from Higher Education Leaders - An Exploratory Study The Organisation's Size-Innovation Performance Relationship: The Role of Human Resource Development Mechanisms A Comparative Review of Sentimental Analysis Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches Vocational Education Information Technology Based on Cross-Attention Fusion Knowledge Map Recommendation Algorithm Redesigning Knowledge Management Through Corporate Sustainability Strategy in the Post-Pandemic Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1