Presidential Threshold and Parliamentary Threshold Setting in Elections

Josef Mario Monteiro
{"title":"Presidential Threshold and Parliamentary Threshold Setting in Elections","authors":"Josef Mario Monteiro","doi":"10.59653/jplls.v1i02.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This conceptual study aims to analyze Presidential Threshold and Parliamentary Threshold arrangements in elections from the regulatory aspect, the implications for the political rights of citizens and political parties and their comparison with other countries. The method used is normative juridical with a conceptual approach, statutory regulations, and comparative law. The legal materials are primary, secondary, and tertiary, then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Based on the results of the research, it can be stated that by setting the Presidential Threshold and Parliamentary Threshold percentages, the right of citizens to participate in government, both to vote and to be elected in elections, has been limited so that from the perspective of people's sovereignty, it has created inequality or in other words, there is no equality, fair to citizens. Because presidential and vice-presidential elections and legislative elections are a consequence of the existence of a democratic system, it should be regulated by laws and regulations that are in favor of the interests of the people and not just camouflage for political elites who prioritize their groups only.","PeriodicalId":431410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i02.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This conceptual study aims to analyze Presidential Threshold and Parliamentary Threshold arrangements in elections from the regulatory aspect, the implications for the political rights of citizens and political parties and their comparison with other countries. The method used is normative juridical with a conceptual approach, statutory regulations, and comparative law. The legal materials are primary, secondary, and tertiary, then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Based on the results of the research, it can be stated that by setting the Presidential Threshold and Parliamentary Threshold percentages, the right of citizens to participate in government, both to vote and to be elected in elections, has been limited so that from the perspective of people's sovereignty, it has created inequality or in other words, there is no equality, fair to citizens. Because presidential and vice-presidential elections and legislative elections are a consequence of the existence of a democratic system, it should be regulated by laws and regulations that are in favor of the interests of the people and not just camouflage for political elites who prioritize their groups only.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选举中的总统门槛和议会门槛设置
本概念性研究旨在从监管方面分析选举中的总统门槛和议会门槛安排,对公民和政党政治权利的影响以及与其他国家的比较。所使用的方法是规范性司法与概念方法,成文法法规和比较法。法律材料分为一级、二级和三级,然后进行描述性定性分析。根据研究结果,可以说,通过设置总统门槛和议会门槛百分比,公民参与政府的权利,无论是在选举中投票还是被选举,都受到了限制,以至于从人民主权的角度来看,它造成了不平等,换句话说,没有平等,对公民公平。因为总统和副总统选举以及立法机构选举是民主制度存在的结果,所以应该用有利于人民利益的法律法规来规范,而不仅仅是为那些只把自己的群体放在首位的政治精英们做伪装。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Transformation and Business Competition Challenges Comparative Analysis of Antitrust Law A New Mode of MSME Empowerment Creating a Strong Indonesian Economy (Perspective on Business Competition Law) Implementation of the Small Fishers Empowerment Policy in Tikke Village, Tikke Raya District, Pasangkayu Regency Implementation of Regional Asset Management Policies at Office of Theduripoku District in Pasangkayu Regency Urgency of Legal Protection for Religious Scholars in Articles on Blasphemy from the Perspectives of Criminology and Victimology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1