Factors that affect the qualification of murder in excess of the measures of detention of the person who committed the crime

V. Agafonov
{"title":"Factors that affect the qualification of murder in excess of the measures of detention of the person who committed the crime","authors":"V. Agafonov","doi":"10.25136/2409-7810.2023.2.40534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The application of the norm enshrined in Article 38 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation raises questions and discussions not only in the doctrine of domestic criminal legislation, but also in investigative and judicial activities. Currently, in the science of criminal law, there are different positions on the issue of the right to take the life of a person who has violated the law during his detention, which may negatively affect the application of legislation. In the study, the author used the dialectical method as a universal method of scientific cognition, which allowed to consider phenomena and processes in their interrelation and interaction. In addition, we have used a number of other methods of scientific research, such as formal legal, comparative legal, statistical, structural and system methods. The purpose of delivering a person who has committed a criminal offense to the authorities excludes the possibility of causing death to the detainee, in case of causing death during detention, these actions will in any case be illegal. Delivery to the authorities means that a living person must be delivered to the authorities. Thus, the deprivation of human life is not provided for in Article 38 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author concludes that the rule on lawful infliction of harm during the detention of a person who has committed an act provided for by criminal law should be expanded and allowed in exceptional cases to cause death to an attacker, which is necessary in the interests of law-abiding citizens, society.\n","PeriodicalId":104482,"journal":{"name":"Полицейская и следственная деятельность","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Полицейская и следственная деятельность","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7810.2023.2.40534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of the norm enshrined in Article 38 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation raises questions and discussions not only in the doctrine of domestic criminal legislation, but also in investigative and judicial activities. Currently, in the science of criminal law, there are different positions on the issue of the right to take the life of a person who has violated the law during his detention, which may negatively affect the application of legislation. In the study, the author used the dialectical method as a universal method of scientific cognition, which allowed to consider phenomena and processes in their interrelation and interaction. In addition, we have used a number of other methods of scientific research, such as formal legal, comparative legal, statistical, structural and system methods. The purpose of delivering a person who has committed a criminal offense to the authorities excludes the possibility of causing death to the detainee, in case of causing death during detention, these actions will in any case be illegal. Delivery to the authorities means that a living person must be delivered to the authorities. Thus, the deprivation of human life is not provided for in Article 38 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author concludes that the rule on lawful infliction of harm during the detention of a person who has committed an act provided for by criminal law should be expanded and allowed in exceptional cases to cause death to an attacker, which is necessary in the interests of law-abiding citizens, society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响谋杀资格的因素超过了对犯罪人的拘留措施
《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第38条所载规范的适用不仅在国内刑事立法理论方面,而且在调查和司法活动方面提出了问题和讨论。目前,在刑法学界,对于在拘留期间违法的人是否有权剥夺其生命的问题存在不同的立场,这可能会对立法的适用产生负面影响。在研究中,作者将辩证方法作为一种普遍的科学认知方法,允许从相互关系和相互作用中考虑现象和过程。此外,我们还使用了一些其他的科学研究方法,如正式法、比较法、统计、结构和系统方法。将犯有刑事罪的人移交给当局的目的,排除了造成被拘留者死亡的可能性,如果在拘留期间造成死亡,这些行动无论如何都是非法的。交付给当局意味着一个活着的人必须被交付给当局。因此,《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第38条没有规定剥夺人的生命。提交人的结论是,应扩大关于在犯有刑法规定的行为的人被拘留期间合法施加伤害的规则,并允许在例外情况下对攻击者造成死亡,这对于守法公民和社会的利益是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Once again about the mechanism of administrative coercion Factors that affect the qualification of murder in excess of the measures of detention of the person who committed the crime The Use of Information Technology in Investigation: Directions, Problems and Prospects On the Question of the Specifics of the Investigative Actions with Minors in the Investigation of Crimes Development of the Quality of Professional Training of Polygraph Examiners in the System of Departmental Education of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1