An Advanced Study on Volar Locking Plate as a Surgical Procedure for Distal Radius Fracture

G. Kastanis, G. Magarakis, P. Kapsetakis, Ioannis M Stavrakakis, A. Pantouvaki
{"title":"An Advanced Study on Volar Locking Plate as a Surgical Procedure for Distal Radius Fracture","authors":"G. Kastanis, G. Magarakis, P. Kapsetakis, Ioannis M Stavrakakis, A. Pantouvaki","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11919d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DRF (distal radius fractures) are the most prevalent type of upper extremity fracture, accounting for 44 percent of all forearm and hand fractures. The goal of surgical treatment for unstable DRF is to restore wrist function. There are proponents in literature suggesting that volar locking plates are the most optional surgical methods in treatment of these fractures. The aim of this study is to answer the question: Is the volar locking plate the only surgical method treating all types of distal radius fractures and decreasing the rate of postsurgical complication? \nMaterials & Methods: 104 fractures in 98 patients with an average age of 48,5 years were treated with a volar locking plate for unstable distal radius fractures. All fractures classified by AO/OTA in A2-3 27 cases, B1-3 in 45 and C1-3 in 32 cases. Most patients operated within 48-72 hours after injury. A volar locking device was used in all DRFs and an extended flexor carpi radialis approach was used in all cases. Low profile locking plates were employed in sixteen cases with base of ulnar styloid fractures, whereas Kirschner wires were used in the other patients. Postoperatively, all patients completed a typical rehabilitation regimen that included passive and active finger and wrist mobility. Results: Complications, time to fracture union, range of motion, Visual Analogue Scale, Quick Dash Score, and Patients-Rated Wrist Evaluation score were all taken into consideration when evaluating patients. Patients under 60 years old with type A2-3 and B1-3 fractures had a superior range of motion and grip strength than those over 65. When comparison to the unilateral side, ROM and grip strength reduced in subjects with type fractures C1-3 and age over 65.In comparison to the other two types of fractures, the percentage of complications and reoperation looked to be higher in type C1-3. Finally, the rates of Quick-DASH, PRWE and range of motion were better in type A, B and C1 than type C2-3, compared with uninjured hand. \nConclusion: In recent years, unstable fractures required surgery treatment, with the volar locking plate serving as the gold standard. Unfortunately, VPL has postoperative difficulties linked to plate and screw position with comminuted fracture or soft tissue injury that cannot be overlooked, and it may be insufficient for all forms of distal radius fractures for these reasons.","PeriodicalId":231604,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11919d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DRF (distal radius fractures) are the most prevalent type of upper extremity fracture, accounting for 44 percent of all forearm and hand fractures. The goal of surgical treatment for unstable DRF is to restore wrist function. There are proponents in literature suggesting that volar locking plates are the most optional surgical methods in treatment of these fractures. The aim of this study is to answer the question: Is the volar locking plate the only surgical method treating all types of distal radius fractures and decreasing the rate of postsurgical complication? Materials & Methods: 104 fractures in 98 patients with an average age of 48,5 years were treated with a volar locking plate for unstable distal radius fractures. All fractures classified by AO/OTA in A2-3 27 cases, B1-3 in 45 and C1-3 in 32 cases. Most patients operated within 48-72 hours after injury. A volar locking device was used in all DRFs and an extended flexor carpi radialis approach was used in all cases. Low profile locking plates were employed in sixteen cases with base of ulnar styloid fractures, whereas Kirschner wires were used in the other patients. Postoperatively, all patients completed a typical rehabilitation regimen that included passive and active finger and wrist mobility. Results: Complications, time to fracture union, range of motion, Visual Analogue Scale, Quick Dash Score, and Patients-Rated Wrist Evaluation score were all taken into consideration when evaluating patients. Patients under 60 years old with type A2-3 and B1-3 fractures had a superior range of motion and grip strength than those over 65. When comparison to the unilateral side, ROM and grip strength reduced in subjects with type fractures C1-3 and age over 65.In comparison to the other two types of fractures, the percentage of complications and reoperation looked to be higher in type C1-3. Finally, the rates of Quick-DASH, PRWE and range of motion were better in type A, B and C1 than type C2-3, compared with uninjured hand. Conclusion: In recent years, unstable fractures required surgery treatment, with the volar locking plate serving as the gold standard. Unfortunately, VPL has postoperative difficulties linked to plate and screw position with comminuted fracture or soft tissue injury that cannot be overlooked, and it may be insufficient for all forms of distal radius fractures for these reasons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掌侧锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端骨折的研究进展
DRF(桡骨远端骨折)是上肢骨折中最常见的类型,占所有前臂和手部骨折的44%。手术治疗不稳定DRF的目的是恢复腕功能。文献中也有支持者认为掌侧锁定钢板是治疗此类骨折最可选择的手术方法。本研究的目的是回答这个问题:掌侧锁定钢板是治疗所有类型桡骨远端骨折并降低术后并发症发生率的唯一手术方法吗?材料与方法:采用掌侧锁定钢板治疗不稳定桡骨远端骨折98例104例,平均年龄48.5岁。所有骨折按AO/OTA分类为A2-3 27例,B1-3 45例,C1-3 32例。大多数患者在受伤后48-72小时内手术。所有DRFs均采用掌侧锁定装置,所有病例均采用桡侧腕屈肌伸入路。16例尺侧茎突骨折采用低轮廓锁定钢板,其余患者采用克氏针固定。术后,所有患者完成了典型的康复方案,包括被动和主动手指和手腕活动。结果:评估患者时考虑并发症、骨折愈合时间、活动范围、视觉模拟评分、Quick Dash评分和患者评定腕关节评估评分。60岁以下A2-3型和B1-3型骨折患者的活动范围和握力优于65岁以上的患者。与单侧相比,C1-3型骨折和65岁以上患者的关节活动度和握力降低。与其他两种类型的骨折相比,C1-3型的并发症和再手术的百分比似乎更高。最后,A型、B型和C1型患者的Quick-DASH率、PRWE率和活动范围均优于C2-3型患者。结论:近年来,不稳定骨折需要手术治疗,以掌侧锁定钢板为金标准。不幸的是,VPL的术后困难与粉碎性骨折或软组织损伤的钢板和螺钉位置有关,这是不可忽视的,由于这些原因,VPL可能不足以治疗所有形式的桡骨远端骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Report on Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Green Cerebrospinal Fluid- Meningitis An Advanced Study on Volar Locking Plate as a Surgical Procedure for Distal Radius Fracture Pulmonary Artery Catheter Versus Central Venous Catheter in Patients Undergoing Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Comparative Approach Determining the Stature Estimation from Facial Parameters amongst Sangli District Population The Inflammasomes: Revamping Periodontal Pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1