Which Factors Influence Practitioners' Usage of Build Automation Tools?

A. Rahman, Asif Partho, David Meder, L. Williams
{"title":"Which Factors Influence Practitioners' Usage of Build Automation Tools?","authors":"A. Rahman, Asif Partho, David Meder, L. Williams","doi":"10.1109/RCoSE.2017.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though build automation tools help to reduce errors and rapid releases of software changes, use of build automation tools is not widespread amongst software practitioners. Software practitioners perceive build automation tools as complex, which can hinder the adoption of these tools. How well founded such perception is, can be determined by systematic exploration of adoption factors that influence usage of build automation tools. The goal of this paper is to aid software practitioners in increasing their usage of build automation tools by identifying the adoption factors that influence usage of these tools. We conducted a survey to empirically identify the adoption factors that influence usage of build automation tools. We obtained survey responses from 268 software professionals who work at NestedApps, Red Hat, as well as contribute to open source software. We observe that adoption factors related to complexity do not have the strongest influence on usage of build automation tools. Instead, we observe compatibility-related adoption factors, such as adjustment with existing tools, and adjustment with practitioner's existing workflow, to have influence on usage of build automation tools with greater importance. Findings from our paper suggest that usage of build automation tools might increase if: build automation tools fit well with practitioners' existing workflow and tool usage, and usage of build automation tools are made more visible among practitioners' peers.","PeriodicalId":394266,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering (RCoSE)","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering (RCoSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCoSE.2017.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Even though build automation tools help to reduce errors and rapid releases of software changes, use of build automation tools is not widespread amongst software practitioners. Software practitioners perceive build automation tools as complex, which can hinder the adoption of these tools. How well founded such perception is, can be determined by systematic exploration of adoption factors that influence usage of build automation tools. The goal of this paper is to aid software practitioners in increasing their usage of build automation tools by identifying the adoption factors that influence usage of these tools. We conducted a survey to empirically identify the adoption factors that influence usage of build automation tools. We obtained survey responses from 268 software professionals who work at NestedApps, Red Hat, as well as contribute to open source software. We observe that adoption factors related to complexity do not have the strongest influence on usage of build automation tools. Instead, we observe compatibility-related adoption factors, such as adjustment with existing tools, and adjustment with practitioner's existing workflow, to have influence on usage of build automation tools with greater importance. Findings from our paper suggest that usage of build automation tools might increase if: build automation tools fit well with practitioners' existing workflow and tool usage, and usage of build automation tools are made more visible among practitioners' peers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些因素影响从业者对构建自动化工具的使用?
尽管构建自动化工具有助于减少错误和快速发布软件变更,但构建自动化工具的使用在软件从业者中并不普遍。软件从业者认为构建自动化工具很复杂,这可能会阻碍这些工具的采用。这种看法的基础有多好,可以通过系统地探索影响构建自动化工具使用的采用因素来确定。本文的目标是通过确定影响这些工具使用的采用因素来帮助软件从业者增加他们对构建自动化工具的使用。我们进行了一项调查,以经验确定影响构建自动化工具使用的采用因素。我们获得了268名软件专业人士的调查回复,他们在NestedApps、Red Hat工作,同时也为开源软件做出贡献。我们观察到,与复杂性相关的采用因素对构建自动化工具的使用没有最强的影响。相反,我们观察到与兼容性相关的采用因素,例如对现有工具的调整,以及对实践者现有工作流的调整,对构建自动化工具的使用具有更重要的影响。我们论文的发现表明,构建自动化工具的使用可能会增加,如果:构建自动化工具与实践者现有的工作流和工具使用很好地匹配,并且构建自动化工具的使用在实践者的同行中更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Application Composition Approach for Rapid Software Engineering CSEPM - A Continuous Software Engineering Process Metamodel Incremental UML for Agile Development: Embedding UML Class Models in Source Code Which Factors Influence Practitioners' Usage of Build Automation Tools? Continuous Prototyping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1