Teaching and Learning Method to Enforce Authorship in College Writing

Y. Kim
{"title":"Teaching and Learning Method to Enforce Authorship in College Writing","authors":"Y. Kim","doi":"10.46392/kjge.2023.17.2.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focused on checking the concept of authorship, which is necessary in college writing class, and providing students a method on how to write in actual class. The authorship required in college writing classes is basically a characteristic required of members of the academic community, but the characteristics of the discourse community emphasized by social constructionists help us understand authorship. Furthermore, the autobiographical self, discoursal self and the possibilities for self-hood in the socio-cultural and institutional context in addition to self as author should be operational in balance to alleviate the problems developed by the lopsidedness of authorship required for academic writing aimed in college writing classes. This is a perspective that it is important in its ability to recognize the presence of authorship in learners from the start and to manifest it after seeing that the method forcing learners to study well only in accordance to the customs of academic community has limitations.We suggested two steps of a detailed learning method to accomplish this goal. First, Bakhtin’s externalization concept in activity for topic establishment was applied for learners to recognize authorship and to allow them to find the status of authorship by themselves. It is to target columns written by professional writers but on topics that are widely accessible, so that learners can find their own authorship as much as professional writers. This method allows learners to have the characteristics of a college student, a consumer, a member of the MZ generation, and a citizen and to find a favorable position to take in order for them to adopt a professional perspective. Next, this method makes learners apprehend the discourse according to presented topic and to draw the perspective of support or agreement. Afterwards, students can incorporate this opinion into their own perspective. Students will be able to examine what perspectives are revealed through issues related to mobility rights for persons with disabilities that were easily accessible to learners, and to experience the process of finding detailed perspectives, The process to experience and to find an attitude of their own is more beneficial for learners to build authorship than the perspective or insistence itself.","PeriodicalId":267224,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of General Education","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of General Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.2.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focused on checking the concept of authorship, which is necessary in college writing class, and providing students a method on how to write in actual class. The authorship required in college writing classes is basically a characteristic required of members of the academic community, but the characteristics of the discourse community emphasized by social constructionists help us understand authorship. Furthermore, the autobiographical self, discoursal self and the possibilities for self-hood in the socio-cultural and institutional context in addition to self as author should be operational in balance to alleviate the problems developed by the lopsidedness of authorship required for academic writing aimed in college writing classes. This is a perspective that it is important in its ability to recognize the presence of authorship in learners from the start and to manifest it after seeing that the method forcing learners to study well only in accordance to the customs of academic community has limitations.We suggested two steps of a detailed learning method to accomplish this goal. First, Bakhtin’s externalization concept in activity for topic establishment was applied for learners to recognize authorship and to allow them to find the status of authorship by themselves. It is to target columns written by professional writers but on topics that are widely accessible, so that learners can find their own authorship as much as professional writers. This method allows learners to have the characteristics of a college student, a consumer, a member of the MZ generation, and a citizen and to find a favorable position to take in order for them to adopt a professional perspective. Next, this method makes learners apprehend the discourse according to presented topic and to draw the perspective of support or agreement. Afterwards, students can incorporate this opinion into their own perspective. Students will be able to examine what perspectives are revealed through issues related to mobility rights for persons with disabilities that were easily accessible to learners, and to experience the process of finding detailed perspectives, The process to experience and to find an attitude of their own is more beneficial for learners to build authorship than the perspective or insistence itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强大学写作作者身份的教学方法
本文通过对大学写作课堂中作者概念的检验,为学生在实际课堂中如何写作提供了一种方法。大学写作课堂对作者身份的要求基本上是学术共同体成员所要求的特征,而社会建构主义者所强调的话语共同体特征则有助于我们理解作者身份。此外,自传性自我、话语性自我以及作为作者的自我在社会文化和制度背景下的自我可能性应该平衡地运作,以减轻大学写作课程中学术写作所要求的作者身份不平衡所带来的问题。这是一种重要的观点,它能够从一开始就认识到学习者身上存在着作者身份,并在看到强迫学习者只按照学术团体的习俗学习的方法有局限性之后表现出来。我们提出了一个详细的学习方法的两个步骤来实现这一目标。首先,运用巴赫金的主题创设活动的外化概念,让学习者认识作者身份,让学习者自己发现作者身份的状态。它的目标是由专业作家撰写的专栏,但主题是广泛可访问的,这样学习者就可以像专业作家一样找到自己的作者。这种方法可以让学习者拥有大学生、消费者、MZ一代和公民的特征,并找到一个有利的立场,以便他们采取专业的观点。其次,这种方法使学习者根据所提出的主题来理解语篇,并得出支持或同意的观点。之后,学生可以把这个观点融入到自己的观点中。学生将能够通过与残疾人行动权相关的问题来考察学习者容易理解的视角,并体验寻找详细视角的过程。体验和找到自己的态度的过程比视角或坚持本身更有利于学习者建立作者身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on Reading Programs in the Convergence Era : Focusing on Book-trailer Activities Liberal Arts Education in the Anthropocene and the PBL Living Lab : Focusing on Korea University's Core Liberal Arts Course LIBERTY JUSTICE TRUTH Ⅱ Posthumanitas : Civilization's Transition and a New Understanding of Humanity Exploring Topics in Domestic Research on Machine Translation through Text Mining A Study on the Competence-based General Education and the Development of Convergent Thinking : Focusing on the Analysis of the Learner Centered Teaching-learning Practices Using Poster Presentations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1