A comparison of close-cell, stripe-cell, and orthogonal-cell low voltage superjunction trench power MOSFETs for linear mode application

Yi Su, M. Bobde, Sik Lui, H. Chang, Qinhai Jin, Lei Zhang
{"title":"A comparison of close-cell, stripe-cell, and orthogonal-cell low voltage superjunction trench power MOSFETs for linear mode application","authors":"Yi Su, M. Bobde, Sik Lui, H. Chang, Qinhai Jin, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ISPSD.2018.8393669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trade-offs between the On Resistance and Linear Mode performance have been compared for different Low Voltage superjunction cell structures, including stripe-cell, closed-cell & orthogonal-cell. The closed-cell has measured RSP of 4.4mΩ·mm2, which is 20% lower than that of the stripe-cell for the same die size and same pitch at the same package. Despite higher trans-conductance, the closed-cell linear mode performance is the same as that of the stripe-cell. The orthogonal-cell has the best linear mode performance, but has high Rds(on) due to current conduction path partially blocked by p-type superjunction column. The tested maximum load current is 38.4A at a drain voltage Vds of 10V and turn-on time of 10 mSec from the orthogonal-cell, which is the highest among the competitors' parts for a power 5×6 clip package. The Rds(on) for orthogonal-cell can be further improved by device optimization.","PeriodicalId":166809,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD)","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPSD.2018.8393669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Trade-offs between the On Resistance and Linear Mode performance have been compared for different Low Voltage superjunction cell structures, including stripe-cell, closed-cell & orthogonal-cell. The closed-cell has measured RSP of 4.4mΩ·mm2, which is 20% lower than that of the stripe-cell for the same die size and same pitch at the same package. Despite higher trans-conductance, the closed-cell linear mode performance is the same as that of the stripe-cell. The orthogonal-cell has the best linear mode performance, but has high Rds(on) due to current conduction path partially blocked by p-type superjunction column. The tested maximum load current is 38.4A at a drain voltage Vds of 10V and turn-on time of 10 mSec from the orthogonal-cell, which is the highest among the competitors' parts for a power 5×6 clip package. The Rds(on) for orthogonal-cell can be further improved by device optimization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
线性模式应用的闭合单元、条纹单元和正交单元低压超结沟槽功率mosfet之比较
比较了不同的低压超结电池结构(包括条纹电池、闭合电池和正交电池)的导通电阻和线性模式性能之间的权衡。闭合电池的RSP值为4.4mΩ·mm2,在相同的封装条件下,闭合电池的RSP值比条纹电池低20%。尽管跨电导较高,但闭合电池的线性模式性能与条纹电池相同。正交电池具有最佳的线性模式性能,但由于p型超结柱部分阻断了电流传导路径,导致Rds(on)过高。测试的最大负载电流为38.a,漏极电压Vds为10V,正交电池导通时间为10 mSec,是同类产品中功率5×6夹封装器件中最高的。正交单元的Rds(on)可以通过器件优化进一步提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CMOS bi-directional ultra-wideband galvanically isolated die-to-die communication utilizing a double-isolated transformer Local lifetime control for enhanced ruggedness of HVDC thyristors P-gate GaN HEMT gate-driver design for joint optimization of switching performance, freewheeling conduction and short-circuit robustness Influence of the off-state gate-source voltage on the transient drain current response of SiC MOSFETs Reduction of RonA retaining high threshold voltage in SiC DioMOS by improved channel design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1