Deep People Detection: A Comparative Study of SSD and LSTM-decoder

Md.Atiqur Rahman, Prince Kapoor, R. Laganière, Daniel Laroche, Changyun Zhu, Xiaoyin Xu, A. Ors
{"title":"Deep People Detection: A Comparative Study of SSD and LSTM-decoder","authors":"Md.Atiqur Rahman, Prince Kapoor, R. Laganière, Daniel Laroche, Changyun Zhu, Xiaoyin Xu, A. Ors","doi":"10.1109/CRV.2018.00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a comparative study of two state-of-the-art object detection architectures - an end-to-end CNN-based framework called SSD [1] and an LSTM-based framework [2] which we refer to as LSTM-decoder. To this end, we study the two architectures in the context of people head detection on few benchmark datasets having small to moderately large number of head instances appearing in varying scales and occlusion levels. In order to better capture the pros and cons of the two architectures, we applied them with several deep feature extractors (e.g., Inception-V2, Inception-ResNet-V2 and MobileNet-V1) and report accuracy, speed and generalization ability of the approaches. Our experimental results show that while the LSTM-decoder can be more accurate in realizing smaller head instances especially in the presence of occlusions, the sheer detection speed and superior ability to generalize over multiple scales make SSD an ideal choice for real-time people detection.","PeriodicalId":281779,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CRV.2018.00050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, we present a comparative study of two state-of-the-art object detection architectures - an end-to-end CNN-based framework called SSD [1] and an LSTM-based framework [2] which we refer to as LSTM-decoder. To this end, we study the two architectures in the context of people head detection on few benchmark datasets having small to moderately large number of head instances appearing in varying scales and occlusion levels. In order to better capture the pros and cons of the two architectures, we applied them with several deep feature extractors (e.g., Inception-V2, Inception-ResNet-V2 and MobileNet-V1) and report accuracy, speed and generalization ability of the approaches. Our experimental results show that while the LSTM-decoder can be more accurate in realizing smaller head instances especially in the presence of occlusions, the sheer detection speed and superior ability to generalize over multiple scales make SSD an ideal choice for real-time people detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度人物检测:SSD和lstm解码器的比较研究
在本文中,我们对两种最先进的目标检测架构进行了比较研究——一种基于端到端cnn的框架(称为SSD[1])和一种基于lstm的框架(称为lstm解码器)[2]。为此,我们在几个基准数据集上研究了这两种架构,这些数据集在不同的尺度和遮挡水平下出现少量到中等数量的头部实例。为了更好地捕捉这两种架构的优缺点,我们将它们与几个深度特征提取器(例如,Inception-V2, Inception-ResNet-V2和MobileNet-V1)一起应用,并报告了这些方法的准确性,速度和泛化能力。我们的实验结果表明,虽然lstm解码器可以更准确地实现较小的头部实例,特别是在存在遮挡的情况下,但绝对的检测速度和卓越的多尺度泛化能力使SSD成为实时人员检测的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic Street View Sampling: High Quality Annotation of Power Infrastructure in Rural Ontario Deep Learning-Driven Depth from Defocus via Active Multispectral Quasi-Random Projections with Complex Subpatterns De-noising of Lidar Point Clouds Corrupted by Snowfall Grading Prenatal Hydronephrosis from Ultrasound Imaging Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Automotive Semi-specular Surface Defect Detection System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1