Opini Warganet mengenai Moderasi Beragama dalam Percakapan Twitter

Nurhayani Saragih, Suraya
{"title":"Opini Warganet mengenai Moderasi Beragama dalam Percakapan Twitter","authors":"Nurhayani Saragih, Suraya","doi":"10.53678/elmadani.v3i01.720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to describe the opinions of influencers in netizen conversations on Twitter regarding religious moderation. The research uses public opinion, agenda setting models, and the spiral of silence to analyze opinions and topics discussed by Mega influencers, Macro influencers, Micro influencers, and Nano influencers. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive content analysis method. Research data obtained using NVivo with the keyword religious moderation. Research results: Most of the public opinion of influencers on twitter are positive. In the account of the nano-influencer, 11 accounts have a negative tone, and 1 account has a neutral tone regarding religious moderation. This study concludes that religious moderation is a government agenda that is socialized through the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia and all its staff. The parties who have different opinions, only a small part express their disapproval of the religious moderation program through Twitter.","PeriodicalId":381875,"journal":{"name":"El Madani : Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El Madani : Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53678/elmadani.v3i01.720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to describe the opinions of influencers in netizen conversations on Twitter regarding religious moderation. The research uses public opinion, agenda setting models, and the spiral of silence to analyze opinions and topics discussed by Mega influencers, Macro influencers, Micro influencers, and Nano influencers. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive content analysis method. Research data obtained using NVivo with the keyword religious moderation. Research results: Most of the public opinion of influencers on twitter are positive. In the account of the nano-influencer, 11 accounts have a negative tone, and 1 account has a neutral tone regarding religious moderation. This study concludes that religious moderation is a government agenda that is socialized through the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia and all its staff. The parties who have different opinions, only a small part express their disapproval of the religious moderation program through Twitter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民对宗教在Twitter对话中温和的看法
这项研究的目的是描述Twitter上网民对话中有影响力的人对宗教节制的看法。本研究使用公众意见、议程设定模型和沉默螺旋来分析超级影响者、宏观影响者、微观影响者和纳米影响者讨论的观点和话题。本研究采用定性方法和描述性内容分析法。研究数据使用NVivo与关键词宗教节制。研究结果:推特网红的舆论大多是正面的。在纳米影响者的账户中,有11个账户对宗教温和持负面态度,1个账户对宗教温和持中性态度。这项研究的结论是,宗教节制是一项通过印度尼西亚共和国宗教部及其所有工作人员社会化的政府议程。在有不同意见的政党中,只有一小部分通过推特表达了对宗教节制计划的反对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communication Style of Imigrant Dai in Da’wah The Challenges of Pancasila Socio-Democracy in The Era of Networked Society: Liberal Democracy and Religious Fundamentalism Analisis Framing pada Pemberitaan Pengaturan Pengeras Suara Masjid di Media Online Akurat.co Analisis Wacana Kritis Konten Youtube Caknun.com pada Playlist Jurnal Medsos dan Rahmatan Lil’alamin Propaganda Pemberitaan Jokowi pada Pemilu 2014 di Majalah Tempo dalam Perspektif Ideologies And Power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1