You too Brutus! Trapping Hateful Users in Social Media: Challenges, Solutions & Insights

Mithun Das, Punyajoy Saha, Ritam Dutt, Pawan Goyal, Animesh Mukherjee, Binny Mathew
{"title":"You too Brutus! Trapping Hateful Users in Social Media: Challenges, Solutions & Insights","authors":"Mithun Das, Punyajoy Saha, Ritam Dutt, Pawan Goyal, Animesh Mukherjee, Binny Mathew","doi":"10.1145/3465336.3475106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hate speech is regarded as one of the crucial issues plaguing the online social media. The current literature on hate speech detection leverages primarily the textual content to find hateful posts and subsequently identify hateful users. However, this methodology disregards the social connections between users. In this paper, we run a detailed exploration of the problem space and investigate an array of models ranging from purely textual to graph based to finally semi-supervised techniques using Graph Neural Networks (GNN) that utilize both textual and graph-based features. We run exhaustive experiments on two datasets -- Gab, which is loosely moderated and Twitter, which is strictly moderated. Overall the AGNN model achieves 0.791 macro F1-score on the Gab dataset and 0.780 macro F1-score on the Twitter dataset using only 5% of the labeled instances, considerably outperforming all the other models including the fully supervised ones. We perform detailed error analysis on the best performing text and graph based models and observe that hateful users have unique network neighborhood signatures and the AGNN model benefits by paying attention to these signatures. This property, as we observe, also allows the model to generalize well across platforms in a zero-shot setting. Lastly, we utilize the best performing GNN model to analyze the evolution of hateful users and their targets over time in Gab.","PeriodicalId":325072,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465336.3475106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Hate speech is regarded as one of the crucial issues plaguing the online social media. The current literature on hate speech detection leverages primarily the textual content to find hateful posts and subsequently identify hateful users. However, this methodology disregards the social connections between users. In this paper, we run a detailed exploration of the problem space and investigate an array of models ranging from purely textual to graph based to finally semi-supervised techniques using Graph Neural Networks (GNN) that utilize both textual and graph-based features. We run exhaustive experiments on two datasets -- Gab, which is loosely moderated and Twitter, which is strictly moderated. Overall the AGNN model achieves 0.791 macro F1-score on the Gab dataset and 0.780 macro F1-score on the Twitter dataset using only 5% of the labeled instances, considerably outperforming all the other models including the fully supervised ones. We perform detailed error analysis on the best performing text and graph based models and observe that hateful users have unique network neighborhood signatures and the AGNN model benefits by paying attention to these signatures. This property, as we observe, also allows the model to generalize well across platforms in a zero-shot setting. Lastly, we utilize the best performing GNN model to analyze the evolution of hateful users and their targets over time in Gab.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你也是,布鲁图斯!在社交媒体中诱捕可恶的用户:挑战,解决方案和见解
仇恨言论被认为是困扰在线社交媒体的关键问题之一。目前关于仇恨言论检测的文献主要利用文本内容来发现仇恨帖子,随后识别仇恨用户。然而,这种方法忽略了用户之间的社会联系。在本文中,我们对问题空间进行了详细的探索,并研究了一系列模型,从纯文本到基于图形的模型,最后使用使用文本和基于图形的特征的图神经网络(GNN)的半监督技术。我们在两个数据集上进行了详尽的实验——Gab是宽松的,而Twitter是严格的。总体而言,AGNN模型在Gab数据集上的宏f1得分为0.791,在Twitter数据集上的宏f1得分为0.780,仅使用5%的标记实例,大大优于所有其他模型,包括完全监督的模型。我们对表现最好的基于文本和图的模型进行了详细的错误分析,并观察到可恶用户具有独特的网络邻域签名,并且AGNN模型通过关注这些签名而受益。正如我们所观察到的,这一特性还允许模型在零射击设置下很好地推广到各个平台。最后,我们利用性能最好的GNN模型来分析仇恨用户及其目标在Gab中随时间的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demonstration of Weblinks: A Rich Linking Layer Over the Web Hate Speech in Political Discourse: A Case Study of UK MPs on Twitter International Teaching and Research in Hypertext Reductio ad absurdum?: From Analogue Hypertext to Digital Humanities RIP Emojis and Words to Contextualize Mourning on Twitter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1