Not Just Math and English: Courses That Pose Obstacles to Community College Completion. CCRC Working Paper No. 52.

M. Zeidenberg, Davis Jenkins, M. Scott
{"title":"Not Just Math and English: Courses That Pose Obstacles to Community College Completion. CCRC Working Paper No. 52.","authors":"M. Zeidenberg, Davis Jenkins, M. Scott","doi":"10.7916/D8XW4T6H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions of the barriers to completion in community colleges have largely focused on student success in introductory college-level math and English courses, and rightfully so, since these courses are typically required for degrees. However, there is a much broader range of courses that also serve as “gatekeepers” in the sense that they are obstacles to completion. This paper offers methods for identifying these courses and for assessing the relative extent of the obstacle to completion each of them poses. We compare the performance in these courses of students who successfully completed a credential with those who did not. We find that the difficulty students experience in succeeding in many other introductory courses is just as great as that posed by college math and English. If colleges want to reduce impediments to graduation, they therefore need to look at a broader range of courses than just math and English and devise strategies for improving student achievement in these courses as well. We also find that overall GPA in college courses is a stronger predictor of completion than performance in any one course. This suggests that colleges need to monitor students’ overall performance to identify those who are in danger of not completing and design academic and non-academic interventions to help them succeed. Conversely, colleges need also to identify students who did well in these obstacle courses but have dropped out, so that they can encourage them to continue. It also suggests that remedial instruction, which is typically focused on math and English, should be rethought and its scope broadened.","PeriodicalId":218750,"journal":{"name":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8XW4T6H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Discussions of the barriers to completion in community colleges have largely focused on student success in introductory college-level math and English courses, and rightfully so, since these courses are typically required for degrees. However, there is a much broader range of courses that also serve as “gatekeepers” in the sense that they are obstacles to completion. This paper offers methods for identifying these courses and for assessing the relative extent of the obstacle to completion each of them poses. We compare the performance in these courses of students who successfully completed a credential with those who did not. We find that the difficulty students experience in succeeding in many other introductory courses is just as great as that posed by college math and English. If colleges want to reduce impediments to graduation, they therefore need to look at a broader range of courses than just math and English and devise strategies for improving student achievement in these courses as well. We also find that overall GPA in college courses is a stronger predictor of completion than performance in any one course. This suggests that colleges need to monitor students’ overall performance to identify those who are in danger of not completing and design academic and non-academic interventions to help them succeed. Conversely, colleges need also to identify students who did well in these obstacle courses but have dropped out, so that they can encourage them to continue. It also suggests that remedial instruction, which is typically focused on math and English, should be rethought and its scope broadened.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不只是数学和英语:对完成社区大学学业构成障碍的课程。CCRC第52号工作文件
关于社区大学学业障碍的讨论主要集中在学生在大学水平的数学和英语入门课程上的成功,这是理所当然的,因为这些课程通常是获得学位所必需的。然而,还有更广泛的课程也起到了“看门人”的作用,因为它们是完成学业的障碍。本文提供了识别这些课程的方法,并评估了完成这些课程的障碍的相对程度。我们比较了成功完成证书的学生和没有完成证书的学生在这些课程中的表现。我们发现,学生在许多其他入门课程上取得成功所遇到的困难与大学数学和英语所带来的困难一样大。因此,如果大学想要减少学生毕业的障碍,他们就需要关注更广泛的课程,而不仅仅是数学和英语,并制定出提高学生在这些课程中的成绩的策略。我们还发现,大学课程的总GPA比任何一门课程的表现都更能预测学生是否能完成学业。这表明,大学需要监控学生的整体表现,以确定哪些学生有无法完成学业的危险,并设计学术和非学术干预措施来帮助他们取得成功。相反,大学也需要找出在这些障碍课程中表现出色但已经辍学的学生,这样他们就可以鼓励他们继续学习。报告还建议,应该重新考虑通常侧重于数学和英语的补习教学,并扩大其范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redefining Full-Time in College: Evidence on 15-Credit Strategies A Growing Culture of Evidence? Findings From a Survey on Data Use at Achieving the Dream Colleges in Washington State Characterizing the Effectiveness of Developmental Education: A Response to Recent Criticism Acceleration Through a Holistic Support Model: An Implementation and Outcomes Analysis of FastStart@CCD Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas. CCRC Working Paper No. 54.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1