Uncertainty Analysis on Global Greenhouse Gas Inventories from Anthropogenic Sources

R. Cong, M. Saito, R. Hirata, A. Ito, Shamil Maksyutov
{"title":"Uncertainty Analysis on Global Greenhouse Gas Inventories from Anthropogenic Sources","authors":"R. Cong, M. Saito, R. Hirata, A. Ito, Shamil Maksyutov","doi":"10.11159/rtese18.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the concerns on climate change increased, accurately quantifying the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from anthropogenic sources has been emphasized more and more. In this paper, uncertainty analysis is conducted for multiple global GHG inventories from anthropogenic sources to explore the sources and the magnitude of them. We first summarize the principal characteristic for 17 global GHG inventories by four indexes. And then to assess the sources and magnitude of uncertainty for these inventories, the discrepancies are quantified on energy statistics data and estimation results of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission on anthropogenic sources at the global total and national scale. Finally, we determine the nations with larger magnitude (extent and proportion) of uncertainty by two indicators which will be helpful for the policy-making on GHG emissions mitigation. As the analysis result, we find that uncertainty of oil consumption data is the largest among major fuels in 2013 as much as 44.6 exajoules (EJ) and the magnitude of uncertainty in CO2 emissions data is significant at global perspective as much as 4.0 petagrams (Pg) CO2 yr-1. At national perspective, as the largest emitter nation in 2013 China, uncertainty from the coal consumption data of which is the largest in major fuels as much as 15.5 EJ and the magnitude of uncertainty for CO2 emissions of China in 2013 is as much as 1.5 Pg CO2 yr-1.","PeriodicalId":445341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation","volume":"2 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/rtese18.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As the concerns on climate change increased, accurately quantifying the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from anthropogenic sources has been emphasized more and more. In this paper, uncertainty analysis is conducted for multiple global GHG inventories from anthropogenic sources to explore the sources and the magnitude of them. We first summarize the principal characteristic for 17 global GHG inventories by four indexes. And then to assess the sources and magnitude of uncertainty for these inventories, the discrepancies are quantified on energy statistics data and estimation results of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission on anthropogenic sources at the global total and national scale. Finally, we determine the nations with larger magnitude (extent and proportion) of uncertainty by two indicators which will be helpful for the policy-making on GHG emissions mitigation. As the analysis result, we find that uncertainty of oil consumption data is the largest among major fuels in 2013 as much as 44.6 exajoules (EJ) and the magnitude of uncertainty in CO2 emissions data is significant at global perspective as much as 4.0 petagrams (Pg) CO2 yr-1. At national perspective, as the largest emitter nation in 2013 China, uncertainty from the coal consumption data of which is the largest in major fuels as much as 15.5 EJ and the magnitude of uncertainty for CO2 emissions of China in 2013 is as much as 1.5 Pg CO2 yr-1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球人为源温室气体清单的不确定性分析
随着人们对气候变化关注的增加,准确量化人为源温室气体排放越来越受到重视。本文对多个全球人为源温室气体清单进行不确定性分析,探讨其来源和规模。本文首先用4个指标总结了17个全球温室气体清单的主要特征。为了评估这些清单的不确定性来源和程度,在全球和国家尺度上对能源统计数据和人为来源的二氧化碳排放估算结果进行了量化。最后,我们通过两个指标确定了不确定性程度(程度和比例)较大的国家,这将有助于制定减缓温室气体排放的政策。作为分析结果,我们发现2013年石油消费数据的不确定性在主要燃料中最大,高达44.6埃焦(EJ),二氧化碳排放数据的不确定性在全球范围内显著,高达4.0千焦(Pg) CO2年-1。从国家层面来看,2013年中国作为最大的排放国,其主要燃料中最大的煤炭消费数据的不确定性高达15.5 EJ, 2013年中国二氧化碳排放的不确定性幅度高达1.5 Pg CO2 year -1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy Transition in Malta: Understanding the Implications on the Environment and Public Perception Decontamination of Automobile Workshop Soils containing Heavy Metals and PAHs using Chelating Agents Inoculation Of Soil With Cadmium-Resistant Actinomycetes Flora Reduces Cadmium Accumulation In Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Pesticide residues in botanics used in feed additives: focusing on wild vs cultivable plants A study of contaminated land in São Paulo city, Brazil and mainly adopted remediation process face a deficient database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1