Google Analytics: Injunctive relief, information requests and damages

P. Hense
{"title":"Google Analytics: Injunctive relief, information requests and damages","authors":"P. Hense","doi":"10.5771/9783748921561-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irrespective of the GDPR, claims for injunctive relief against the disclosure of personal data can also be based on German tort law according to a decision of the Regional Court of Dresden.2 The unauthorised disclosure of the plaintiff’s personal data by the defendant constitutes a violation of the plaintiff’s general individual right to privacy, in particular the right to “informational self-determination“. Unless the plaintiff has actively consented, no valid consent exists. Visiting a website cannot in itself be regarded as the (implied) granting of consent. The fact that the plaintiff visits a website that uses Google Analytics without “anonymizeIp” cannot be construed as improper conduct on the part of the plaintiff which, according to Section 242 BGB (German Civil Code), would preclude him from exercising his rights. This conduct is legitimised by the general freedom of information.3 High requirements must be placed on the presumption of improper conduct of proceedings. There is no improper interest on the part of the plaintiff with regard to obtaining a fee, as the plaintiff initially contacted the defendant privately by email without claiming any costs.","PeriodicalId":326055,"journal":{"name":"Turning Point in Data Protection Law","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turning Point in Data Protection Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921561-151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrespective of the GDPR, claims for injunctive relief against the disclosure of personal data can also be based on German tort law according to a decision of the Regional Court of Dresden.2 The unauthorised disclosure of the plaintiff’s personal data by the defendant constitutes a violation of the plaintiff’s general individual right to privacy, in particular the right to “informational self-determination“. Unless the plaintiff has actively consented, no valid consent exists. Visiting a website cannot in itself be regarded as the (implied) granting of consent. The fact that the plaintiff visits a website that uses Google Analytics without “anonymizeIp” cannot be construed as improper conduct on the part of the plaintiff which, according to Section 242 BGB (German Civil Code), would preclude him from exercising his rights. This conduct is legitimised by the general freedom of information.3 High requirements must be placed on the presumption of improper conduct of proceedings. There is no improper interest on the part of the plaintiff with regard to obtaining a fee, as the plaintiff initially contacted the defendant privately by email without claiming any costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谷歌分析:禁令救济,信息请求和损害赔偿
无论GDPR如何,根据德累斯顿地区法院的一项裁决,针对个人数据披露的禁令救济索赔也可以基于德国侵权法。2被告未经授权披露原告的个人数据构成对原告一般个人隐私权的侵犯,特别是“信息自决权”的侵犯。除非原告主动同意,否则不存在有效的同意。访问网站本身不能被视为(暗示的)同意。原告访问未使用“anonymizeIp”的谷歌分析网站的事实不能被解释为原告的不当行为,根据BGB(德国民法典)第242条,这将妨碍他行使其权利。一般的信息自由使这种行为合法化对诉讼行为不当的推定必须提出很高的要求。原告在获得费用方面没有不正当的利益,因为原告最初是通过电子邮件私下联系被告,没有要求支付任何费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accountability – the gravity centre of GDPR The DPO and the messenger of bad news How to ‘provide’ information (Art. 12 GDPR)? European Court of Justice requires active behavior Liability of private parties for data protection breaches Google Analytics: Injunctive relief, information requests and damages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1