Maturity of health care testbeds – A qualitative mapping at the Nordic context

Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Eva Collanus, Janne Lahtiranta, Antti Tuomisto
{"title":"Maturity of health care testbeds – A qualitative mapping at the Nordic context","authors":"Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Eva Collanus, Janne Lahtiranta, Antti Tuomisto","doi":"10.23996/fjhw.111734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative mapping aimed to report health care testbed activities in Finland and two other Nordic countries and describe the maturity of these testbeds. The data were collected in 2021 with semi-structured interviews from twelve organizations, of which seven were university hospitals, four universities of applied sciences and one primary health care organization. The data were analyzed using deductive content analysis based on previously identified maturity factors: resources, facilities, marketing and communications, repeatability, contract models, certification and standards compliance and time at the market area. According to the results, there were testbed activities in all participating organizations. The testbed activities mainly were funded from various projects, and the staff mainly consisted of single employees. The testbed facilities were both real-life environments and test or simulation labs. The marketing and communications were based on web pages, social media, events and networks. The repeatability was ensured primarily with usability testing, and the contract models were under development in most organizations. Certification and standards of compliance were rare. Time at the market area was relatively short in many organizations as the activities were mainly testing single products or services rather than continuous co-creation. Testbed activities in the health care and higher education organizations are merging with the daily operations in Nordic countries. Specialization within the organizations was seen, for example, robotics, rehabilitation or medical devices. Testbed organizations highlighted the need for more structured and coordinated processes and activities in order to ensure the management, quality and effectiveness of their testbed services.","PeriodicalId":424295,"journal":{"name":"Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.111734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative mapping aimed to report health care testbed activities in Finland and two other Nordic countries and describe the maturity of these testbeds. The data were collected in 2021 with semi-structured interviews from twelve organizations, of which seven were university hospitals, four universities of applied sciences and one primary health care organization. The data were analyzed using deductive content analysis based on previously identified maturity factors: resources, facilities, marketing and communications, repeatability, contract models, certification and standards compliance and time at the market area. According to the results, there were testbed activities in all participating organizations. The testbed activities mainly were funded from various projects, and the staff mainly consisted of single employees. The testbed facilities were both real-life environments and test or simulation labs. The marketing and communications were based on web pages, social media, events and networks. The repeatability was ensured primarily with usability testing, and the contract models were under development in most organizations. Certification and standards of compliance were rare. Time at the market area was relatively short in many organizations as the activities were mainly testing single products or services rather than continuous co-creation. Testbed activities in the health care and higher education organizations are merging with the daily operations in Nordic countries. Specialization within the organizations was seen, for example, robotics, rehabilitation or medical devices. Testbed organizations highlighted the need for more structured and coordinated processes and activities in order to ensure the management, quality and effectiveness of their testbed services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健试验台的成熟度——北欧背景下的定性映射
这一定性绘图旨在报告芬兰和另外两个北欧国家的医疗保健试验台活动,并描述这些试验台的成熟度。数据是在2021年通过对12个组织的半结构化访谈收集的,其中7个组织是大学医院、4所应用科学大学和1个初级保健组织。数据的分析采用演绎内容分析,基于之前确定的成熟度因素:资源、设施、营销和沟通、可重复性、合同模式、认证和标准合规以及在市场区域的时间。根据结果,在所有参与组织中都有测试平台活动。试验台活动主要由各种项目资助,工作人员主要由单个员工组成。试验台设施既包括真实环境,也包括测试或模拟实验室。营销和传播是基于网页、社交媒体、活动和网络。可重复性主要是通过可用性测试来确保的,大多数组织都在开发合同模型。认证和遵守标准是罕见的。在许多组织中,市场领域的时间相对较短,因为活动主要是测试单个产品或服务,而不是持续的共同创造。保健和高等教育组织的试验台活动正在与北欧国家的日常业务相结合。例如,在机器人技术、康复或医疗设备等方面,各组织都实现了专业化。测试平台组织强调需要更加结构化和协调的过程和活动,以确保其测试平台服务的管理、质量和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Käyttöönoton ajankohdan sekä osaamiseen ja koulutukseen liittyvien tekijöiden yhteys sairaanhoitajien antamaan arvioon asiakas- tai potilastietojärjestelmästä Balancing stakeholder interests and paradoxes in health data sharing within health ecosystems Co-creating a service ecosystem for supporting digitalization in health and welfare Telephone consultation as a sustainable method of service delivery in occupational medicine: results of a qualitative study DIGIDIA-project: Experiences of video-enabled receptions for prevention of type 2 diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1