Can Accurate Predictions Improve Video Streaming in Cellular Networks?

X. Zou, Jeffrey Erman, V. Gopalakrishnan, Emir Halepovic, R. Jana, Xin Jin, J. Rexford, R. Sinha
{"title":"Can Accurate Predictions Improve Video Streaming in Cellular Networks?","authors":"X. Zou, Jeffrey Erman, V. Gopalakrishnan, Emir Halepovic, R. Jana, Xin Jin, J. Rexford, R. Sinha","doi":"10.1145/2699343.2699359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing video streaming algorithms use various estimation approaches to infer the inherently variable bandwidth in cellular networks, which often leads to reduced quality of experience (QoE). We ask the question: \"If accurate bandwidth prediction were possible in a cellular network, how much can we improve video QoE?\". Assuming we know the bandwidth for the entire video session, we show that existing streaming algorithms only achieve between 69%-86% of optimal quality. Since such knowledge may be impractical, we study algorithms that know the available bandwidth for a few seconds into the future. We observe that prediction alone is not sufficient and can in fact lead to degraded QoE. However, when combined with rate stabilization functions, prediction outperforms existing algorithms and reduces the gap with optimal to 4%. Our results lead us to believe that cellular operators and content providers can tremendously improve video QoE by predicting available bandwidth and sharing it through APIs.","PeriodicalId":252231,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"154","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2699343.2699359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 154

Abstract

Existing video streaming algorithms use various estimation approaches to infer the inherently variable bandwidth in cellular networks, which often leads to reduced quality of experience (QoE). We ask the question: "If accurate bandwidth prediction were possible in a cellular network, how much can we improve video QoE?". Assuming we know the bandwidth for the entire video session, we show that existing streaming algorithms only achieve between 69%-86% of optimal quality. Since such knowledge may be impractical, we study algorithms that know the available bandwidth for a few seconds into the future. We observe that prediction alone is not sufficient and can in fact lead to degraded QoE. However, when combined with rate stabilization functions, prediction outperforms existing algorithms and reduces the gap with optimal to 4%. Our results lead us to believe that cellular operators and content providers can tremendously improve video QoE by predicting available bandwidth and sharing it through APIs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准确的预测能改善蜂窝网络中的视频流吗?
现有的视频流算法使用各种估计方法来推断蜂窝网络中固有的可变带宽,这往往导致体验质量(QoE)的降低。我们提出了这样一个问题:“如果在蜂窝网络中可以实现准确的带宽预测,那么我们可以在多大程度上提高视频QoE?”假设我们知道整个视频会话的带宽,我们表明现有的流媒体算法只能达到最佳质量的69%-86%。由于这些知识可能不切实际,我们研究的算法可以知道未来几秒钟的可用带宽。我们观察到,仅靠预测是不够的,实际上可能导致QoE下降。然而,当与速率稳定函数相结合时,预测优于现有算法,并将与最优算法的差距缩小到4%。我们的研究结果使我们相信,蜂窝运营商和内容提供商可以通过预测可用带宽并通过api共享带宽来极大地提高视频QoE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mobile AD(D): Estimating Mobile App Session Times for Better Ads A Wireless Spectrum Analyzer in Your Pocket Energy-Efficiency Comparison of Mobile Platforms and Applications: A Quantitative Approach Can Accurate Predictions Improve Video Streaming in Cellular Networks? Sound Shredding: Privacy Preserved Audio Sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1